2015
DOI: 10.4102/hts.v71i1.2888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spirituality of Q

Abstract: The Spirituality of QThe term spirituality is notoriously difficult to define, as is evidenced by the discussions between contemporary sociologists of religion. If there are any central elements to such a definition, they revolve around the search for the sacred, and the view that certain practices or beliefs lead to humans being placed in a position of privileged access to the transcendent dimension. Often such spiritual experiences and insights are the result of practices that seek deeper communication with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hartin has also focused on questions about Q that are not related to the letter of James. Influenced by Kloppenborg's (1987a) proposed stratification of Q, Hartin argued in 1994 that the proclamation of Jesus was in the first place about a present reality called the kingdom of God, but that the Jesus 1.For example, Botha 1996;Deist 1993;Thirion 1997;Stander 2005;Viljoen 2008; 2.For example, Bazzana 2014;Foster 2015;Grundeken 2012;Peters 2016;Schmithals 2008;Schröter 1996;Sim 2000;Tripp 2013. 3.Engelbrecht (1996, for example, critically considered the contribution of two Markan commentaries that were written from the perspective of the Griesbach hypothesis, finding that these two commentaries fail to explain source-critical issues sufficiently.…”
Section: Patrick Hartinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartin has also focused on questions about Q that are not related to the letter of James. Influenced by Kloppenborg's (1987a) proposed stratification of Q, Hartin argued in 1994 that the proclamation of Jesus was in the first place about a present reality called the kingdom of God, but that the Jesus 1.For example, Botha 1996;Deist 1993;Thirion 1997;Stander 2005;Viljoen 2008; 2.For example, Bazzana 2014;Foster 2015;Grundeken 2012;Peters 2016;Schmithals 2008;Schröter 1996;Sim 2000;Tripp 2013. 3.Engelbrecht (1996, for example, critically considered the contribution of two Markan commentaries that were written from the perspective of the Griesbach hypothesis, finding that these two commentaries fail to explain source-critical issues sufficiently.…”
Section: Patrick Hartinmentioning
confidence: 99%