2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spell of cuteness in food consumption? It depends on food type and consumption motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies associate food with hedonic consumption (e.g. Bagchi and Block, 2011; Crolic and Janiszewski, 2016; Lee et al , 2018), and this activity is typically stimulated by the motivation for mood enhancement and self-indulgence (Atalay and Meloy, 2011; Crolic and Janiszewski, 2016; Khare and Chowdhury, 2015; Salerno et al , 2014). As most food photos posted on Instagram are positioned to satisfy consumer hedonic needs (Dhir et al , 2018; Phua, Jin and Kim, 2017), the result of the present study supports findings from Kim, Lee and Chung (2017) suggesting that consumer responses to photos are related more strongly to pleasantness and cognitive stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies associate food with hedonic consumption (e.g. Bagchi and Block, 2011; Crolic and Janiszewski, 2016; Lee et al , 2018), and this activity is typically stimulated by the motivation for mood enhancement and self-indulgence (Atalay and Meloy, 2011; Crolic and Janiszewski, 2016; Khare and Chowdhury, 2015; Salerno et al , 2014). As most food photos posted on Instagram are positioned to satisfy consumer hedonic needs (Dhir et al , 2018; Phua, Jin and Kim, 2017), the result of the present study supports findings from Kim, Lee and Chung (2017) suggesting that consumer responses to photos are related more strongly to pleasantness and cognitive stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies in Japan have investigated different implications of the Japanese word “kawaii” and the English word “cute” (Nittono, 2016), and compared the psychophysiological responses of individuals toward kawaii photos with and without baby schemata (Nittono & Ihara, 2017). Studies in Taiwan have focused on the formation of cute elements, the effect of cute elements on consumers, and cute self‐presentation (e.g., Chang, 2009; Lee, Chang, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuteness is an emerging field of research and has been attracting attention in various areas, such as psychology (Sherman and Haidt, 2011;Nittono, 2016), neuroscience (Kringelbach et al, 2016), humanities (Dale et al, 2017;May, 2019), marketing (Nenkov and Scott, 2014), and engineering (Marcus et al, 2017). The objects of cuteness include babies and animals (Little, 2012;Borgi and Cirulli, 2016), industrial designs (Miesler et al, 2011), robots (Caudwell et al, 2019), and foods (Lee et al, 2018). In English, cuteness is regarded as "infant physical attractiveness" (Karraker and Stern, 1990), which is a trait of an object and something to be perceived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%