Purpose To investigate the performance of integrated approaches that combined intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters compared with the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) to establish multiparameter thresholds scores or probabilities by using Bayesian analysis to distinguish malignant from benign breast lesions and their correlation with molecular prognostic factors. Materials and Methods Between May 2013 and March 2015, 411 patients were prospectively enrolled and 199 patients (allocated to training [n = 99] and validation [n = 100] sets) were included in this study. IVIM parameters (flowing blood volume fraction [fIVIM] and pseudodiffusion coefficient [D*]) and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters (theoretical apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] at b value of 0 sec/mm [ADC] and kurtosis [K]) by using IVIM and kurtosis models were estimated from diffusion-weighted image series (16 b values up to 2500 sec/mm), as well as a synthetic ADC (sADC) calculated by using b values of 200 and 1500 (sADC) and a standard ADC calculated by using b values of 0 and 800 sec/mm (ADC). The performance of two diagnostic approaches (combined parameter thresholds and Bayesian analysis) combining IVIM and diffusion parameters was evaluated and compared with BI-RADS performance. The Mann-Whitney U test and a nonparametric multiple comparison test were used to compare their performance to determine benignity or malignancy and as molecular prognostic biomarkers and subtypes of breast cancer. Results Significant differences were found between malignant and benign breast lesions for IVIM and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters (ADC, K, fIVIM, fIVIM · D*, sADC and ADC; P < .05). Sensitivity and specificity for the validation set by radiologists A and B were as follows: sensitivity, 94.7% and 89.5%, and specificity, 75.0% and 79.2% for sADC, respectively; sensitivity, 94.7% and 96.1%, and specificity, 75.0% and 66.7%, for the combined thresholds approach, respectively; sensitivity, 92.1% and 92.1%, and specificity, 83.3% and 66.7%, for Bayesian analysis, respectively; and sensitivity and specificity, 100% and 79.2%, for BI-RADS, respectively. The significant difference in values of sADC in progesterone receptor status (P = .002) was noted. sADC was significantly different between histologic subtypes (P = .006). Conclusion Approaches that combined various IVIM and non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging parameters may provide BI-RADS-equivalent scores almost comparable to BI-RADS categories without the use of contrast agents. Non-Gaussian diffusion parameters also differed by biologic prognostic factors. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Background: Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (UF-DCE) breast MRI is considered a promising method of accelerated breast MRI. However, the value of new kinetic parameters derived from UF-DCE need clinical evaluation. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the maximum slope (MS), time to enhancement (TTE), and time interval between arterial and venous visualization (AVI) derived from UF-DCE MRI using compressed sensing (CS). Study Type: Retrospective. Population: Seventy-five patients with histologically proven breast lesions. The total number of analyzed lesions was 90 (61 malignant and 29 benign). Field Strength/Sequence: 3T MRI with UF-DCE MRI based on the 3D gradient-echo volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence using incoherent k-space sampling combined with a CS reconstruction followed by conventional DCE MRI. Assessment: The diagnostic performance of the MS, TTE, AVI, and conventional kinetic analysis was analyzed and compared with histology. Statistical Tests: Wilcoxon rank sum test, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: The MS was larger and the TTE and AVI were smaller for malignant lesions compared with benign lesions: MS: 29.3%/s and 18.4%/s (P < 0.001), TTE: 7.0 and 12.0 seconds (P < 0.001), AVI: 2.7 and 4.4 frames (P = 0.006) for malignant and benign lesions. The discriminating power of the MS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) was slightly better than that of conventional kinetic analysis (AUC, 0.69) and comparable to that of the TTE and AVI (AUC, 0.78 and 0.76 for TTE and AVI, respectively). Invasive lobular carcinoma had smaller MS (21.8%/s) among malignant lesions (29.3%/s). Data Conclusion: The MS, TTE, and AVI can be used to evaluate breast lesions with clinical performance equivalent to that of conventional kinetic analysis. These parameters vary among histologies. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

No abstract

Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (UF-DCE) MRI is a new approach to capture kinetic information in the very early post-contrast period with high temporal resolution while keeping reasonable spatial resolution. The detailed timing and shape of the upslope in the time–intensity curve are analyzed. New kinetic parameters obtained from UF-DCE MRI are useful in differentiating malignant from benign lesions and in evaluating prognostic markers of the breast cancers. Clinically, UF-DCE MRI contributes in identifying hypervascular lesions when the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is marked on conventional dynamic MRI. This review starts with the technical aspect of accelerated acquisition. Practical aspects of UF-DCE MRI include identification of target hypervascular lesions from marked BPE and diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions based on new kinetic parameters derived from UF-DCE MRI: maximum slope (MS), time to enhance (TTE), bolus arrival time (BAT), time interval between arterial and venous visualization (AVI), and empirical mathematical model (EMM). The parameters derived from UF-DCE MRI are compared in terms of their diagnostic performance and association with prognostic markers. Pitfalls of UF-DCE MRI in the clinical situation are also covered. Since UF-DCE MRI is an evolving technique, future prospects of UF-DCE MRI are discussed in detail by citing recent evidence. The topic covers prediction of treatment response, multiparametric approach using DWI-derived parameters, evaluation of tumor-related vessels, and application of artificial intelligence for UF-DCE MRI. Along with comprehensive literature review, illustrative clinical cases are used to understand the value of UF-DCE MRI.