1993
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spectral image processing system (SIPS)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
550
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,455 publications
(655 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
550
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2a) and ground truths (to identify the spectral signatures of relevant soil uses and crop types) has allowed a spatially-distributed and updated description of the soil uses which exerts a fundamental control on the soil mosture dynamics and the ensuing runoff production. The classification procedure adopted was based on the spectral angle mapper (SAM) algorithm (Kruse et al, 1993) and its application is shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Source Area Geomorphic Transitions Legendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a) and ground truths (to identify the spectral signatures of relevant soil uses and crop types) has allowed a spatially-distributed and updated description of the soil uses which exerts a fundamental control on the soil mosture dynamics and the ensuing runoff production. The classification procedure adopted was based on the spectral angle mapper (SAM) algorithm (Kruse et al, 1993) and its application is shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Source Area Geomorphic Transitions Legendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance-based classifiers (EMD and SAM) confirmed their underperformance compared to statistical and non-parametric algorithms (MLC and NN). This is probably due to EMD and SAM lacking capabilities in handling intra-class variance into the classification decision rules [South et al, 2004], and in their original design being based on spectral rather than multi-temporal information [Kruse et al, 1993;South et al, 2004]. Moreover, SAM invariance to relative magnitude of input features is possibly adding some confusion when inputs are multi-temporal VIs profiles [Kruse et al, 1993].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to EMD and SAM lacking capabilities in handling intra-class variance into the classification decision rules [South et al, 2004], and in their original design being based on spectral rather than multi-temporal information [Kruse et al, 1993;South et al, 2004]. Moreover, SAM invariance to relative magnitude of input features is possibly adding some confusion when inputs are multi-temporal VIs profiles [Kruse et al, 1993]. MCL requires the availability of training data, which could limit its operational implementation; alternative approaches could be rule-based classifiers exploiting spectraltemporal profiles and synthetic features as input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations