1982
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90072-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The specific involvement of coat protein in tobacco mosaic virus cross protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been postulated that one of the underlying mechanisms of cross-protection is that the presence of coat protein from the first virus acts to inhibit the uncoating of the second challenge virus or that it encapsidates the RNA of the challenging strain thereby preventing its replication. Although results with viroids (Niblett et al, 1978) and coat profein-deficient mutants of TMV (Sarkar & Smitamana, 1981) argue against this mechanism, other experiments demonstrating that naked CMV RNA or TMV RNA, or TMV RNA trans-encapsidated in brome mosaic virus coat protein effectively escaped the protection afforded by previous infection with a mild strain of the relevant virus (Dodds et al, 1985;Sherwood & Fulton, 1982), indicate that inhibition of virus uncoating plays some role in cross-protection. The extent to which classical cross-protection and the coat protein-mediated resistance in transgenic plants are related biological phenomena remains to be determined.…”
Section: Potato Virus S (Pvs) Is a Member Of The Carlavirus Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been postulated that one of the underlying mechanisms of cross-protection is that the presence of coat protein from the first virus acts to inhibit the uncoating of the second challenge virus or that it encapsidates the RNA of the challenging strain thereby preventing its replication. Although results with viroids (Niblett et al, 1978) and coat profein-deficient mutants of TMV (Sarkar & Smitamana, 1981) argue against this mechanism, other experiments demonstrating that naked CMV RNA or TMV RNA, or TMV RNA trans-encapsidated in brome mosaic virus coat protein effectively escaped the protection afforded by previous infection with a mild strain of the relevant virus (Dodds et al, 1985;Sherwood & Fulton, 1982), indicate that inhibition of virus uncoating plays some role in cross-protection. The extent to which classical cross-protection and the coat protein-mediated resistance in transgenic plants are related biological phenomena remains to be determined.…”
Section: Potato Virus S (Pvs) Is a Member Of The Carlavirus Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many years of study since its discovery by McKinney (1929), cross-protection is still poorly understood mechanistically (Ziebell, 2008). In certain instances, successful cross-protection between viral strains involves the coat protein, presumably where the presence of the coat protein of the protective strain inhibits the uncoating of challenge-strain virions (Culver, 1996;de Zoeten & Fulton, 1975;Koo et al, 2004;Lu et al, 1998;Sherwood, 1987;Sherwood & Fulton, 1982). However, not all instances of cross-protection can be explained this way (Gerber & Sarkar, 1989;Zaitlin, 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, the CP of a protecting virus present in cells may inhibit the uncoating step of an incoming virus. This case was first reported by Sherwood and Fulton (1982) who showed difficulty of infection by TMV in the yellow region of leaves with mosaic symptoms. Abel et al (1986) showed delayed expression of symptoms after inoculation with TMV in CP-expressing transgenic tobacco.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Cross Protection/interferencementioning
confidence: 99%