Watershed Models 2005
DOI: 10.1201/9781420037432.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SPAW Model for Agricultural Field and Pond Hydrologic Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] lists some of these land surface models, which include the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere-Water model [40,41], US Department of Agriculture Hydrograph Laboratory [42,43], Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model [44], and soil vegetation atmosphere transfer schemes [45]. However, the difficulty associated with measuring physical parameters required by these models serves as an impediment for their intensive use in agricultural management [20].…”
Section: Soil Moisture Measurement and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] lists some of these land surface models, which include the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere-Water model [40,41], US Department of Agriculture Hydrograph Laboratory [42,43], Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model [44], and soil vegetation atmosphere transfer schemes [45]. However, the difficulty associated with measuring physical parameters required by these models serves as an impediment for their intensive use in agricultural management [20].…”
Section: Soil Moisture Measurement and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D 25 is the molecular diffusivity of CO 2 (1.4 × 10 −5 m 2 s −1 ) at 298 K; θ a is the proportion of soil pores filled with air; θ a = θ sat -θ w , where θ sat is the soil water content at saturation estimated to be 0.46 m 3 m −3 at the site (Saxton and Willey, 2006), b is the soil water retention parameter, determined to be equal to 6.2 in this study (Cosby et al, 1984), T 25 = 298 K and n is 1.5 (Bird et al, 2002).…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical soil characteristic parameters, including the soil moisture content at wilting point (% cm 3¨c m´3), soil moisture content at field capacity (% cm 3¨c m´3), soil moisture content at saturation (% cm 3¨c m´3) and the hydraulic conductivity of the saturated soil (cm¨d´1), were estimated using the module Soil-Water-CharacTeristics (SWCT) of the Soil-Plant-Air-Water (SPAW) model [38] Water-limited production levels were considered to investigate the responses of winter wheat to climatic variability in the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate change scenarios because water-limited production levels represent the maximum yield obtained under rain-fed conditions. The management parameters were held constant, and the mean sowing dates for each 30-year period and conditions with no irrigation and fertilization were considered.…”
Section: The Crop Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%