The Spanish Language 5-Item Oral Health Impact Profile

Simancas‐Pallares, Miguel; John, Mike T.; Enstad, Christopher; Lenton, Patricia A

doi:10.1111/idj.12534

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…31, 3.35) indicate that have relatively worse OHRQoL than those Spanish-speaking dental patients in USA (3.7, 4.0). 35 Poor OHRQoL, as identified by an OHIP-5 score of 3 or higher on at least two of the five items, 36 account for 63.4%, and only 9.68% (18/186) had a total score of 0, which means there are no symptoms of discomfort in the oral cavity. The highest scores were found for the entry of having experienced significant pain, with 80.64% of patients reporting pain, 33.3% for mild pain, 30.6% for moderate pain, and 4.3% and 1.1% for more severe and very severe pain, respectively; 64.51% of patients had difficulty biting or chewing food, and 68.28% of patients reported feeling uncomfortable eating; while the overall scores for the entries of difficulty completing daily tasks and poor taste sensation were low, indicating that oral health conditions have less impact on taste and daily tasks.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Oral Health Behaviors and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dental Patients in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

AN¹,

Li²,

Li³

et al. 2022

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Purpose: Oral health plays an important role in overall health. But little is known about the problems with oral health behaviors and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among dental patients in China. This study aimed to investigate oral health behaviors and OHRQoL, as well as to examine the effects of oral health behaviors and associated factors on OHRQoL among dental patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2022 to July 2022 in the Department of Stomatology of the First Mobile General Hospital of Armed Police, Hebei, China. The five-item short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) was used to evaluate OHRQoL. Oral health behaviors were assessed by a 16-items oral health behavior questionnaire, and sociodemographic data were collected by a socio-demographic questionnaire. The t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate the associations between the study variables. Results: 186 participants were included in the study. The average age of the participants was 24.62 years (SD = 10.67). The mean OHIP-5 score was 4.31 (SD =3.35). Oral health-related quality of life differed significantly by smoking history, history of alcohol consumption, work status, economic pressure, self-rated oral health status, daily brushing frequency, dental caries condition, and whether they take the initiative to learn about oral health. Multivariate analysis found that the self-rated oral health status and work status were significantly associated with the OHIP scores. The retired people and those with poor self-rated oral health displayed poor OHRQoL. Conclusion:In general, dental patients' oral health needs to be improved, the majority of patients reported practicing poor oral health behaviors, among which the retired population and hose with poor self-rated oral health showed poor OHRQoL. OHRQoL in dental patients is a complex issue associated with social and behavioral factors.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding OHRQoL, the mean score and its standard deviation of OHIP-5 of patients attending dentistry clinics (4.31, 3.35) indicate that have relatively worse OHRQoL than those Spanish-speaking dental patients in USA (3.7, 4.0). 35 Poor OHRQoL, as…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral Health Behaviors and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dental Patients in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

AN¹,

Li²,

Li³

et al. 2022

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the Swedish 14-item and 5-item short form of the OHIP (OHIP-S14 and OHIP-S5) correlated highly with the 49-item OHIP ( r ≥ 0.97 for OHIP-S14, r ≥ 0.92 for OHIP-S5) [ 39 , 40 ]. Also, the Spanish language 5-item OHIP (OHIP-Sp5) summary scores showed “very large” effect ( r = 0.95) in correlation with OHIP-Sp14 as well as with OHIP-Sp49 [ 37 ]. Nevertheless, in many cases, the coefficient of determination R 2 is simply the square of the correlation coefficient r , i.e., r = 0.95 would correspond to R 2 = 0.90, demonstrating our findings do not differ substantially from those of Swedish and Spanish OHIP short forms.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The development of short versions is also a current trend for dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs). One example in dentistry is the 5-item OHIP (OHIP-5) that is already validated in German [ 35 ], English [ 36 ], and Spanish [ 37 ]. This short version collects about 90% of the information from the original 49-item version, demonstrating its capabilities as a valuable tool for evaluating OHRQoL [ 35 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Orofacial appearance is increasingly recognized as an important dental patient-reported outcome making instrument development and refinement efforts to measure the outcome better necessary. The aim of this study was to derive a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES). Materials and methods OES data were collected from a consecutive sample of a total of 2113 adult English- or Spanish-speaking dental patients from HealthPartners dental clinic in Minnesota. Participants with missing data were excluded and analysis were performed using data from 2012 participants. Orofacial appearance was assessed with the English and the Spanish language version of the OES. Linear regression analysis was performed, with the OES item 8 (“Overall, how do you feel about the appearance of your face, your mouth, and your teeth?”) as the predictor variable and the OES summary score as the criterion variable, to calculate the adjusted coefficients of determination (R2). Results The value of adjusted R2 was 0.83, indicating that the OES item 8 score explained about 83% of the variance of the OES summary score. The difference in R2 scores between the two language groups was negligible. Conclusion The OES item 8 can be used for the one-item OES (OES-1). It is a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring orofacial appearance. Clinical relevance Due to its easy application and sufficient psychometric properties, the OES-1 can be used effectively as an alternative to longer OES instruments in all areas of dental practice and research.

show abstract

“… 2 , 6 The original instrument has 49 items representing 7 domains 7 and has been validated in Spanish, 8 Italian 9 and even reduced and simplified to 5 items. 10 However, there are no records on the HRQOL of bichectomy patients in Spanish-speaking databases, so longitudinal studies and large numbers of participants are impossible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chilean Patients’ Perception of Their Oral Health-Related Quality of Life After Bichectomy

F¹,

Nunez²,

Gutiérrrez³

et al. 2022

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To describe the quality of life associated with oral health in patients who have had bichectomy surgery in Chile using the Spanish version of the health-Related Quality of Life instrument (HRQOL-sp). Material and Methods: We designed a cross-sectional study. The HRQOL-sp scale was administered to dental patients in a private clinic who had bichectomy surgery between December 2020 and June 2021. The HRQOL-sp instrument has four domains: oral function, general activity, postoperative signs, symptoms or complications, and pain level. The instrument was administered by telephone survey on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-surgery. Interference in quality of life was defined as when patients selected the options "quite a few problems" or "many problems" for oral function and general activity. Signs and symptoms related to post-surgical complications and pain were also described with a verbal rating scale from one to ten. All results were compared between postoperative days according to the domains of the HRQOL-sp scale. Results: Seventy-three patients (age 27.75 ± 8.06 years; 93.15% female) participated. Bichectomy patients report the highest interference in quality of life on the first postoperative day because most were unable to chew (71.23%). On the first and third postoperative days, the most frequent complication was swelling (97.26%), and on the fifth day was ecchymosis (42.47%). The average worst perceived pain was 3.34±2.32 on the verbal analogue scale. The rest of the evaluated items significantly decreased towards the seventh postoperative day (p<0.05). Conclusion:Interference in quality of life associated with bichectomy surgery is greatest on the first postoperative day. Complications and pain levels decreased significantly over time.

show abstract

The Spanish Language 5-Item Oral Health Impact Profile

Cited by 15 publications

References 37 publications

Oral Health Behaviors and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dental Patients in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Oral Health Behaviors and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dental Patients in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale

Chilean Patients’ Perception of Their Oral Health-Related Quality of Life After Bichectomy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About