1960
DOI: 10.2307/1376514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Southern Form of the Pilot Whale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also stated that the two subspecies do not qualify as Evolutionary Significant Units (ESU) according to the reciprocal monophyly criterion of Moritz (1994) 21 , only reporting restrictions to gene flow among the areas of distribution mainly based on differences in the frequency of shared haplotypes. In the study of Oremus et al, (2009), preliminary genetic data support a biogeographic scenario previously proposed by Davies (1960) 22 . A colonization event from south to north would have taken place through a founder effect, followed by demographic population growth.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors also stated that the two subspecies do not qualify as Evolutionary Significant Units (ESU) according to the reciprocal monophyly criterion of Moritz (1994) 21 , only reporting restrictions to gene flow among the areas of distribution mainly based on differences in the frequency of shared haplotypes. In the study of Oremus et al, (2009), preliminary genetic data support a biogeographic scenario previously proposed by Davies (1960) 22 . A colonization event from south to north would have taken place through a founder effect, followed by demographic population growth.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Southern Hemisphere long-finned pilot whales were originally described as a distinct species, G. leucosagmaphora 15 , but eventually ranked as one of the two subspecies of G. melas 16 , based on observations of the coloration pattern and morphology 16,17 . Sergeant (1962) stated that he found only minor differences in coloration and none in external morphology between specimens from the two hemispheres, albeit being in agreement with the subspecies classification proposed by Davies (1960) 16 . The author also expressed the need of including samples from additional localities, in order to assess the variation of the colour pattern in the subspecies, as also recommended by other authors 18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, haplotype frequencies were significantly different ( F ST = 0.427, P < 0.001), indicating strong restrictions on current gene flow between these populations. The sharing of mtDNA haplotypes and the absence of clear morphological differences between the two populations (Davis, 1960) would not support a species ranking under most species concepts (Reeves et al ., 2004). Thus, the results of the present study are consistent with the current species delimitation in LFPW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic variations of these two species are discussed in the literature (Cope 1876; Rayner 1939; Davies 1960, Sergeant 1962 a , b ; Yonekura et al 1980; Gaskin 1982; Kasuya et al 1988; Bloch and Lastein 1993; Bloch et al 1993 b ; Jefferson et al 2008), though few morphometric and pigmentation comparisons have been made between these two species, particularly those found in the northwest Atlantic. Morphological (Yonekura et al 1980, Kasuya et al 1988, Bloch and Lastein 1993, ICES 1993, Perryman and Lynn 1993, Wang et al 2000) and pigmentation (Perrin 1972, Yonekura et al 1980, Evans et al 1982, Baird and Stacey 1988, Koopman and Gaskin 1994, Pitman and Ensor 2003) analyses have been accepted methods for discriminating among other species and subpopulations of odontocetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%