1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(90)90004-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Somatosensory Amplification Scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
388
1
22

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 553 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
17
388
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The summary suggests that the distress intolerance construct is represented by five distress intolerance constructs: uncertainty, ambiguity, physical discomfort, frustration, and negative emotion. Bardeen et al confirmed this summary based on a factor analysis of scores from subscales derived from the Intolerance of Uncertainty Index-Part A (Carleton, Gosselin, & Asmundson, 2010), the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Buhr & Dugas, 2002), the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance-I (McLain, 1993), the Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale-12 (Herman, Stevens, Bird, Mendenhall, & Oddou, 2010, a revised version of RE-REFINING DISTRESS INTOLERANCE 4 Budner's (1962) 16-item version), the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (Barsky, Wyshak, & Klerman, 1990), the DIS (Schmidt et al, 2006), the FDS (Harrington, 2005), and the DTS (Simons & Gaher, 2005).…”
Section: Re-refining the Measurement Of Distress Intolerancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The summary suggests that the distress intolerance construct is represented by five distress intolerance constructs: uncertainty, ambiguity, physical discomfort, frustration, and negative emotion. Bardeen et al confirmed this summary based on a factor analysis of scores from subscales derived from the Intolerance of Uncertainty Index-Part A (Carleton, Gosselin, & Asmundson, 2010), the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Buhr & Dugas, 2002), the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance-I (McLain, 1993), the Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale-12 (Herman, Stevens, Bird, Mendenhall, & Oddou, 2010, a revised version of RE-REFINING DISTRESS INTOLERANCE 4 Budner's (1962) 16-item version), the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (Barsky, Wyshak, & Klerman, 1990), the DIS (Schmidt et al, 2006), the FDS (Harrington, 2005), and the DTS (Simons & Gaher, 2005).…”
Section: Re-refining the Measurement Of Distress Intolerancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The somatosensory amplification scale (SSAS; Barsky, Wyshak & Klerman, 1990) was used to control for tendencies of amplifying ambiguous sensory information in line with findings that have shown amplification to be related to heightened somatic perceptions as well as depression and anxiety (Barsky, Goodson, Lane, & Cleary, 1988). Ratings were made to statements such as 'sudden loud noises really bother me', 'I hate to be too hot or too cold' on a Likert scale ranging from 1…”
Section: Somatosensory Amplification Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves sustained self-examination and increased attention and vigilance to unpleasant somatic sensations, a predisposition to observe the weakest and rarest of somatic sensations, and a tendency to interpret them as dangerous signs of disease without any rational argument. 2 Somatosensory amplification theoretically has the properties of both a trait and a state. Indeed, although the propensity to amplify seems relatively stable over the long term (individual's characteristic baseline level), the sensitivity to bodily sensations can fluctuate within the same individual over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although the propensity to amplify seems relatively stable over the long term (individual's characteristic baseline level), the sensitivity to bodily sensations can fluctuate within the same individual over time. 2 Somatosensory amplification is especially noticeable among hypochondriacs. 3,4 It has been proposed as an intermediary phenomenon that occurs after detecting benign bodily sensations and precedes hypochondriacal beliefs and thoughts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation