2014
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2014/38:3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sociomaterialty of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
211
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(111 reference statements)
3
211
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that the concept of entanglement, as proposed by Barad [2] and taken up by Orlikowski [3], unfortunately implies the idea of things -for instance, meaning and matter [2] or sociality and materiality [4] -being wrapped or twisted together, which implies that their ontological distinction is still maintained even if their entanglement indeed makes this distinction difficult to make. This language problem has been mentioned by Orlikowski herself [4], but also by Kautz and Jensen [5] as well as Cecez-Kecmanovic [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we believe that the concept of entanglement, as proposed by Barad [2] and taken up by Orlikowski [3], unfortunately implies the idea of things -for instance, meaning and matter [2] or sociality and materiality [4] -being wrapped or twisted together, which implies that their ontological distinction is still maintained even if their entanglement indeed makes this distinction difficult to make. This language problem has been mentioned by Orlikowski herself [4], but also by Kautz and Jensen [5] as well as Cecez-Kecmanovic [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can thus be easily mistaken for a form of radical constructionism. The second issue concerns the ambiguity of expressions such as "the constitutive entanglement of meaning and matter" or expressions such as "material discursive practices", which both authors keep using in their respective work (see also [4][5][6] on this language problem).…”
Section: Sociomateriality: Weak and Strong Versionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, they call for more research in the area. Additionally, in line with an increased focus on sociomaterial research (Cecez-Kecmanovic, Galliers, Henfridsson, Newell, & Vidgen, 2010;Kautz & Jensen, 2013;Orlikowski, 2007), we need more researchers and practitioners to apply the sociomaterial perspective in design (Leonardi & Rodriguez-Lluesma, 2012). Designers should create a practice that enables possibilities for experiences rather than trying to predefine and control a design so it fits a plan (Germonprez, Hovorka, & Collopy, 2007;Germonprez, Hovorka, & Gal, 2011;Orlikowski & Hofman, 1997).…”
Section: Given the Current Evidence Of Unprecedented Shifts Associatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media practice as defined above is used in this paper in order to move away from the two extreme but common scholarly conceptualizations of social media as either 1) a bare technology determining the activity and change of users and organizations or 2) something (undefined) that is socially constructed in the organization [42,43]. Instead, in this study, communicators, citizens and social media, together and in interaction, are conceptualized as equally important actors constituted in the boundary practice.…”
Section: Learning Mechanisms At the Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%