1990
DOI: 10.3817/1290086081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Society of the Spectacle 20 Years Later: A Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criticisms of Debord's pessimism and even paranoia became particularly common after the publication of his admittedly much bleaker Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (1990). See, for example, Berman et al (1990). 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticisms of Debord's pessimism and even paranoia became particularly common after the publication of his admittedly much bleaker Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (1990). See, for example, Berman et al (1990). 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guy Debord's thesis about the "society of the spectacle" (2006), for example, did much to dampen the critical thrust of the realism that documentary film and photography seemed aligned with. Debord's thesis focused on the ideological and illusionistic dimensions of contemporary society, effectively (if implicitly) accusing all camera-based practices of objectifying the world and superficially portraying appearances as if they were contiguous with reality (for a rather devastating critique of Debord, see Berman, Pan, and Piccone 1990). In short, photorealism in moving and still images was treated as suspect by those on the left, even though socialist publications continued to use such images and, indeed, even model their images on mainstream pictorial conventions:…”
Section: Worker Film and Photographymentioning
confidence: 99%