“…As for Twitter use during elections, Larsson and Moe (2012) showed for the 2010 elections that the conversation was concentrated among journalists, politicians and political bloggers, with few conversations involving the public and few replies to tweets. This is similar to the finding by Hedman and Djerf-Pierre (2013) that journalists mainly use Twitter for self-branding rather than engaging in conversations with their readers or viewers. The same applies to tweeting in relation to talk shows that feature politicians and current affairs guests: Larsson (2013) examined a whole season of a popular talk show and noted that the top tweeters were all journalists whereas a broader public did not become involved in the programme.…”
Section: Digital Media and Politics In Sweden And Americasupporting
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information:
“…As for Twitter use during elections, Larsson and Moe (2012) showed for the 2010 elections that the conversation was concentrated among journalists, politicians and political bloggers, with few conversations involving the public and few replies to tweets. This is similar to the finding by Hedman and Djerf-Pierre (2013) that journalists mainly use Twitter for self-branding rather than engaging in conversations with their readers or viewers. The same applies to tweeting in relation to talk shows that feature politicians and current affairs guests: Larsson (2013) examined a whole season of a popular talk show and noted that the top tweeters were all journalists whereas a broader public did not become involved in the programme.…”
Section: Digital Media and Politics In Sweden And Americasupporting
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information:
“…In addition to national surveys, international comparisons, and analyses of social media adoption based on journalist profiles, a number of studies have investigated specific functions for Twitter in the newsroom, including the use of Twitter in promoting content (Bandari, Asur, & Huberman, 2012;Greer & Ferguson, 2011), the impact of social media use on professional values and journalistic norms (Hedman & Djerf-Pierre, 2013), and how social media may be redefining or reshaping the production and consumption of news (Bruns & Highfield, 2012;Newman, 2011;Newman, Dutton, & Blank, 2012). These studies often raise concerns over the core values of journalism and the importance of trust and verification when it comes to incorporating social media content in news production and storytelling (Bruno, 2011;Hedman & Djerf-Pierre, 2013;Newman et al, 2012).…”
Twitter has been widely adopted into journalistic workflows, as it provides instant and widespread access to a plethora of content about breaking news events, while also serving to disseminate reporting on those events. The content on Twitter, however, poses several challenges for journalists, as it arrives unfiltered, full of noise, and at an alarming velocity. Building on the results of the first national survey of social media use in Irish newsrooms, this paper investigates the adoption of social media into journalistic workflows, journalists' attitudes towards various aspects of social media, and the content and perspectives generated by these online communities. It particularly investigates how Twitter shapes the processes of sourcing and verification in newsrooms, and assesses how notions of trust factor into the adoption of the Twitter platform and content into these processes. The paper further analyses relationships between journalist profile and adopted practices and attitudes, and seeks to understand how Twitter operates in the current journalistic landscape. While this paper draws its data from a survey of journalists in Ireland, the analysis of the relationship between trust, sourcing, and verification reveals broader patterns about journalistic values, and how these values and practices may operate in the field of journalism as a whole.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…Los autores concluyen que los periodistas han normalizado e integrado Twitter en su quehacer diario, tanto para informar, como para buscar información y fuentes (Newman, 2009;Broersma y Graham, 2012;Brown Smith, 2012;Carrera et al, 2012;Lasorsa et al, 2012;Artwick, 2013;Gulyas, 2013;Hedman y Djerf-Pierre, 2013). Los periodistas van de ronda por Twitter, en busca de noticias o ideas para nuevos enfoques, igual que acuden al juzgado, al ayuntamiento o al Congreso (Broersma y Graham, 2012: 405).…”
Section: Los Periodistas Buscan Información Y Contactan Con Fuentesunclassified
“…Transformaciones en las rutinas periodísticas 2. Cambios en las normas y principios clásicos del periodismo Respecto a las rutinas productivas, se aborda cómo y con qué finalidad utilizan Twitter los periodistas y los medios (Bruns, 2005;Farhi, 2009;Newman, 2009;Ahmad, 2010;García de Torres et al, 2011;Broersma y Graham, 2012;Carrera et al, 2012;Lasorsa et al, 2012;Messner et al, 2012;Túñez López, 2012;Artwick, 2013;Hedman y Djerf-Pierre, 2013;Noguera, 2013;Said Hung et al, 2013).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.