2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social income inequality, social integration and health status of internal migrants in China

Abstract: BackgroundTo examine the interaction between social income inequality, social integration, and health status among internal migrants (IMs) who migrate between regions in China.MethodsWe used the data from the 2014 Internal Migrant Dynamic Monitoring Survey in China, which sampled 15,999 IMs in eight cities in China. The Gini coefficient at the city level was calculated to measure social income inequality and was categorized into low (0.2 < Gini <= 0.3), medium (0.3 < Gini <= 0.4), high (0.4 < x < = 0.5), and v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower values indicate less inequality in the distribution of the resources, and higher values suggest greater inequality. A Gini coefficient < 0.2 indicates absolute equality, 0.2-0.3 low inequality, 0.3-0.4 medium inequality, 0.4-0.5 high inequality and > 0.5 represents extreme inequality (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Gini Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower values indicate less inequality in the distribution of the resources, and higher values suggest greater inequality. A Gini coefficient < 0.2 indicates absolute equality, 0.2-0.3 low inequality, 0.3-0.4 medium inequality, 0.4-0.5 high inequality and > 0.5 represents extreme inequality (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Gini Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the results are largely inconsistent across studies. A few studies have shown that local inequality relates to stronger feelings of unhappiness, psychological distress, or depression incidence among low-income respondents compared with high-income respondents (Ahern & Galea, 2006;Lin, Zhang, Chen, & Ling, 2017;Oishi et al, 2011). However, the apparent majority of studies showed that individual income does not moderate the relation between income inequality and subjective well-being (Kelley & Evans, 2017), economic worries (Roth, Hahn, & Spinath, 2017), positional concerns (Burns, Tomita, & Lund, 2017), status anxiety (Layte & Whelan, 2014), depressive symptoms (Van Deurzen et al, 2015), or the prevalence of dysthymic, depressive, and anxiety disorders (Sturm & Gresenz, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [23] noted that long working hours, which are common among rural migrant workers, could explain health deterioration. Lin et al [24] underlined the association between social integration, income equality, and health status. Li Ji [25] concluded that health status worsened with greater urbanization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%