2001
DOI: 10.1080/13611260120046665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Construction of Mentoring Roles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple roles that can be assumed by a mentor, as shown in Figure 3, suggest that the work of a mentor is complex and multifaceted (Hall et al, 2008;Lucas, 2001). The following key points that emerge from Figure 3 are:…”
Section: Figure 3 -Mentoring Roles and Associated Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple roles that can be assumed by a mentor, as shown in Figure 3, suggest that the work of a mentor is complex and multifaceted (Hall et al, 2008;Lucas, 2001). The following key points that emerge from Figure 3 are:…”
Section: Figure 3 -Mentoring Roles and Associated Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, Norman and Feiman-Nemser (2005) believe that the expectations that both the mentor and mentee hold about the task at hand will determine how the mentoring relationship is approached and how each interacts with the other. Furthermore, Lucas (2001) in her study about mentoring relationships between undergraduates and primary aged students found that the roles were redefined on a continuous basis. Lucas (2001, p.46) reports that 'time, experience together, and the perceptions and interpretations of each person continually redefine the roles of the mentor and the mentee'.…”
Section: Assessormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the nature of each mentoring relationship is idiosyncratic (Johnson & Huwe, 2003) and based on reciprocity, the mentor, as well as the protégé, derives unique benefits from the relationship (see also Jacobi, 1991). Additionally, each relationship is dynamic and continually coconstructed, affecting the activities, identities, understandings, and practices of its participants (Lave & Wenger, 1991;Fletcher, 2000;Lucas, 2001;Zachary, 2002). Thus, the quality of any mentorship is affected by the roles, personalities, abilities, and needs of the people involved, and by various situational and environmental factors (O'Neil & Wrightsman, 2001).…”
Section: Mentoring Graduate Studentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Initial expectations may come from public service campaigns (Baker & Maguire, 2005), from their own memories of having been mentored (Lucas, 2001), or may derive from mentor training (Stukas & Tanti, 2005). Regardless of source, mentor expectations are related to mentor satisfaction within the relationship, mentor behaviors, and outcomes such as choosing to maintain or terminate the relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%