The social amplification and attenuation of COVID-19 risk perception shaping mask wearing behavior: A longitudinal twitter analysis

Abstract

Introduction Twitter represents a mainstream news source for the American public, offering a valuable vehicle for learning how citizens make sense of pandemic health threats like Covid-19. Masking as a risk mitigation measure became controversial in the US. The social amplification risk framework offers insight into how a risk event interacts with psychological, social, institutional, and cultural communication processes to shape Covid-19 risk perception. Methods Qualitative content analysis was conducted on 7,024 mask tweets reflecting 6,286 users between January 24 and July 7, 2020, to identify how citizens expressed Covid-19 risk perception over time. Descriptive statistics were computed for (a) proportion of tweets using hyperlinks, (b) mentions, (c) hashtags, (d) questions, and (e) location. Results Six themes emerged regarding how mask tweets amplified and attenuated Covid-19 risk: (a) severity perceptions (18.0%) steadily increased across 5 months; (b) mask effectiveness debates (10.7%) persisted; (c) who is at risk (26.4%) peaked in April and May 2020; (d) mask guidelines (15.6%) peaked April 3, 2020, with federal guidelines; (e) political legitimizing of Covid-19 risk (18.3%) steadily increased; and (f) mask behavior of others (31.6%) composed the largest discussion category and increased over time. Of tweets, 45% contained a hyperlink, 40% contained mentions, 33% contained hashtags, and 16.5% were expressed as a question. Conclusions Users ascribed many meanings to mask wearing in the social media information environment revealing that COVID-19 risk was expressed in a more expanded range than objective risk. The simultaneous amplification and attenuation of COVID-19 risk perception on social media complicates public health messaging about mask wearing.

Adolescent COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making among Parents in Southern California

“…Parents uncertain about vaccinating their children expressed low confidence in the vaccine and mistrust in government regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and public health officials. Parents’ mistrust exhibited a spillover effect from early pandemic blunders, when public health authorities gave inconsistent messaging on masks [ 36 , 37 ].…”

Influence of diverse kinds of persuasive messages on intention to stay home during COVID-19 pandemic: Moderating role of media type

“…The severity of COVID-19 risk is declared in different ways. On one hand, descriptions of increases in hospitalizations and deaths enhance the COVID-19 severity perception; On the other hand, comparisons with the flu and rural states not yet experiencing COVID-19 downplays the risk [28] . During this period of time, whether the control policies are activated by governments or the implementation of these norms is voluntary, the effectiveness of containment measures depends on the people's perception of contagious risks [68] .…”

“Even We Are Confused”: A Thematic Analysis of Professionals' Perceptions of Processed Foods and Challenges for Communication

“…It was paradoxical that participants identify a need for consumers to understand the nuances about food processing and healthy diets, yet disagree and are uncertain as to the messages to pass on. Conflict and disagreement among professionals could sow doubts and amplify consumer confusion about this topic, leading to either (a) amplified or attenuated perception of risk; (b) loss of trust; (c) rejection of any messages ( 49 ). Public scepticism in science is particularly evident in relation to certain topics, recently made salient with societal discussion on COVID-19 ( 50 ).…”