1976
DOI: 10.1021/ja00440a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SN2-SN1 spectrum. 2. Quantitative treatments of nucleophilic solvent assistance. A scale of solvent nucleophilicities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
204
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
9
204
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 More recently, NT scales based on the solvolyses of the S-methyldibenzothiophenium ion (MeDBTh + ) 6,7 have been developed, in which the leaving group is a neutral molecule, which is little influenced by solvent change. The N T values have been become the recognized standards for considerations of solvent nucleophilicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 More recently, NT scales based on the solvolyses of the S-methyldibenzothiophenium ion (MeDBTh + ) 6,7 have been developed, in which the leaving group is a neutral molecule, which is little influenced by solvent change. The N T values have been become the recognized standards for considerations of solvent nucleophilicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extended Grunwald-Winstein equation (eqn 1) [1][2][3][4] is very useful for the correlation of solvolysis reactions: log(k/k 0 ) RX …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, it is seen that the extent of scrambling for a given cation generated from reaction in TFE-2,6-lutidine or CF3COOH-CF3COOAg is much greater than the corresponding scrambling for the same cation generated from reaction in HOAc-AgOAc. This is not surprising since in solvents of low nucleophilic character, such as TFE or trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (22), the cation would have a longer lifetime, thus allowing for more 1,2-shifts and giving rise to a greater amount of scrambling. For a given set of cations that differ only in the migrating aryl group, with the aryl groups at the migration origin and migration terminus remaining the same, such as cations l , 2 , and 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6, or 7 , 8 , and 9, an increasing extent of scrambling follows the order of increasing migratory aptitude, i.e., the order in the extent of scrambling is 3 > 2 > 1, 6 > 5 > 4, and 9 > 8 > 7, in accord with the expected order of migratory aptitude of An > To1 > Ph.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%