The “Smart Work” Myth: How Bureaucratic Inertia and Workplace Culture Stymied Digital Transformation in the Relocation of South Korea’s Capital

Abstract

Starting in 2012, the South Korean government has implemented a large-scale relocation of its central government agencies, which are now split between the existing capital city (Seoul) and a new administrative-capital city (Sejong). One of the most controversial aspects of the relocation has been the bureaucratic inefficiency caused by its split nature. ICT-enabled solutions, dubbed "Smart Work", were adopted to deal with this challenge, but have not been effective in avoiding inefficiency. In this article, we argue that different forms of organisational inertia created resistance to switching from traditional work routines to Smart Work's ICT-assisted equivalents. Various forms of inertiapsychological (anxiety around learning new technologies), cognitive (culture/norms in face-to-face work routines), technological (stickiness of pre-existing IT system), political (continued influence from elected officials), and resource allocation (success bias from previous digital government projects)significantly influenced public managers' work practices in Sejong. These types of inertia, we argue, have reinforced face-to-face communication rather than digital communication, on-site visits rather than video-conferencing, and fixedtime work rather than flex-work. Our findings challenge dominant views from functionalist models of digital transformation and emphasise the importance of cultural congruency between workplace norms and technophilic business processes.

Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors

“…On the contrary, digital transformation processes and outcomes are likely to be impeded by obsolete team collaboration and communication habits. In particular, inertia about the pre-existing on-site collaboration and face-to-face communication routines often results in the inadaptability or even resistance to the transformation toward digitalized work and communication processes ( Alshawi and Ingirige, 2003 ; Hur et al, 2019 ). Enhancing team communication and collaboration through social and technological scaffolds is therefore vital in the face of digital transformation.…”

Does the Medium Matter? Linking Citizens’ Use of Communication Platform for Information about Urban Policies to Decision to Trust in Local Government

“…The Seoul Metropolitan Government's urban policies have strong focus on urban sustainability infinitives [74], and they, for instance, has formulated Sustainable Development Vision, that include twelve strategies, twenty-eight tasks and thirty dedicated indicators-they are committed to implement the international sustainable development agendas and review the impact on urban governance and activities based on sustainability impact assessment [14]. In 2018, the Seoul Metropolitan Government also announced the Seoul Sustainable Development Goals that embody the city government's direction of development as a sustainable city with 17 major goals with 96 targets indicators-Seoul's plan includes various aspects of sustainability such as initiatives that reduce the concentration of fine dust to 70% and the generation of greenhouse gases to 40% responding to climate change, make sure that all citizens have access to safe and well-balanced food, receive quality education at a reasonable cost, and satisfy the basic needs of vulnerable social groups.…”

Smart cities as a platform for technological and social innovation in productivity, sustainability, and livability: A conceptual framework

“…Governmental approaches are efforts for smart city making in a wide range of sectors ( Anthopoulos, 2017 ). In a narrow scope, governmental approaches include administrative services for citizens such as e-government and inner- and intergovernmental facilities such as e-conference facilities ( Hur et al, 2019 ). Infrastructure is an essential component under government control.…”