1976
DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(76)90012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The smallest digital replant yet?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience is similar. The artery available for anastomoses is very small, of 0.3 mm diameter (Gaul and Nunley, 1988), 0.4 mm (Kubo et al, 1976) and can be as small as 0.2 mm (Yamano, 1993). The vein size was 0.1 to 0.2 mm in diameter and in one report vein anastomosis failed (Kubo et al, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experience is similar. The artery available for anastomoses is very small, of 0.3 mm diameter (Gaul and Nunley, 1988), 0.4 mm (Kubo et al, 1976) and can be as small as 0.2 mm (Yamano, 1993). The vein size was 0.1 to 0.2 mm in diameter and in one report vein anastomosis failed (Kubo et al, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%