The Slope of the Phillips Curve: Evidence from U.S. States

Abstract

We estimate the slope of the Phillips curve in the cross section of U.S. states using newly constructed state-level price indexes for nontradeable goods back to 1978. Our estimates indicate that the slope of the Phillips curve is small and was small even during the early 1980s. We estimate only a modest decline in the slope of the Phillips curve since the 1980s. We use a multiregion model to infer the slope of the aggregate Phillips curve from our regional estimates. Applying our estimates to recent unemployment dynamics yields essentially no missing disinflation or missing reinflation over the past few business cycles. Our results imply that the sharp drop in core inflation in the early 1980s was mostly due to shifting expectations about long-run monetary policy as opposed to a steep Phillips curve, and the greater stability of inflation between 1990 and 2020 is mostly due to long-run inflation expectations becoming more firmly anchored.

The scars of supply shocks: Implications for monetary policy

“…Moreover, a value of ξ = 0.2 falls into the range of the empirical Phillips curves estimates for the United States. For instance,Barnichon and Mesters (2020) estimate a slope of 0.4, whileHazell et al (2022) estimate a flatter Phillips curve with a slope close to 0.1. All other parameters are kept as in the earlier figures.…”

Global Supply Chain Disruptions: Challenges for Inflation and Monetary Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…We now add dynamics and price rigidities. These can be microfounded using the standard New Keynesian machinery, such as the model used in Hazell et al (2022).…”

Lives and Livelihood, Not Quite a Trade-Off: A Cross-Country Analysis of the Short-Term Impact of COVID-19 Mortality on Real GDP

“…However, later renditions proposed there is no such trade-off in the long-run, or if the trade-off is exploited by attempting to control both variables 1 . Recent research, however, finds the lack of such trade-off, and that the anchoring of inflation expectations was the principalis modus operandi (Hazell et al 2022). In a similar tone, a higher-level take on the LLTO asks then if believing in a trade-off lands both the economy, and the state of the pandemic, in a 'bad' equilibrium (economy tanks and pandemic escalates), as opposed to a 'good' equilibrium (pandemic is contained, and economic cost is smaller) if policy actors were coordinated to prioritise public health goals.…”