2004
DOI: 10.1080/1463922031000075061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of theoretical concepts in activity theory for applied research in aviation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenge for the field is to be able to provide research findings that are not “lost in translation” (Burton‐West et al, 2005) or to find languages, theories, or models that are used in reference disciplines and can help inform both systems design and information behavior. Activity theory is recognized as theory that is highly applied (Ponomarenko, 2004) and allows links to practice particularly in the analysis of work, technology, and education (Rogers, 2008) as well as use in HCI (Bertelsen, Bødker, & John, 2003) and system design. As Miettinen (2006) notes that activity theory is an interventionist research approach with relevant concepts that are based on the dialogue between the researchers and the people they are studying.…”
Section: Motivations and Openingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge for the field is to be able to provide research findings that are not “lost in translation” (Burton‐West et al, 2005) or to find languages, theories, or models that are used in reference disciplines and can help inform both systems design and information behavior. Activity theory is recognized as theory that is highly applied (Ponomarenko, 2004) and allows links to practice particularly in the analysis of work, technology, and education (Rogers, 2008) as well as use in HCI (Bertelsen, Bødker, & John, 2003) and system design. As Miettinen (2006) notes that activity theory is an interventionist research approach with relevant concepts that are based on the dialogue between the researchers and the people they are studying.…”
Section: Motivations and Openingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used to study the micro practice of strategy in UK universities ( Jarzabkowski, 2003), in developing stronger links between psychology and ergonomics (Zarakovsky, 2004), in the development of ergonomics and the relationship between 306 IJPPM 65,3 psychology and systems design , in the application of psychology theory to practical situations, particularly in the study of pilot-system ergonomics and design (Ponomarenko, 2004), to explain the dynamics of negotiations in Higher Education Institutes in the UK and USA in the "social collaborative activity" of information system development (Benson and Whitworth, 2007, p. 88), its role in tailoring the structure of the development method to suit organisational and situational requirements (Karlsson and Wistrand, 2006), and to review the individual and societal customer-centred e-commerce literature (Carillo and Beaudry, 2006).…”
Section: Activity Theory As a Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how to make the physical properties of the alarm -mainly noise, frequency, and color -more salient and distinguishable from the background. However this approach appears as limited in scope as humans react to the significance and meaning that an alarm brings on a specific situation, rather than physical characteristics of signal display only (Norros, 2004;Ponomarenko, 2004;Woods, 1995;Xiao et al 2004).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%