2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0235-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of oral streptococci in patients with pneumonia with risk factors for aspiration: the bacterial floral analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Abstract: BackgroundAspiration pneumonia has been a growing interest in an aging population. Anaerobes are important pathogens, however, the etiology of aspiration pneumonia is not fully understood. In addition, the relationship between the patient clinical characteristics and the causative pathogens in pneumonia patients with aspiration risk factors are unclear. To evaluate the relationship between the patient clinical characteristics with risk factors for aspiration and bacterial flora in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 53 taxa that we found shifted between sampling groups, the most dramatic change was in a Streptococcus taxon, which was much more abundant in aspirating children ( Figure S19). An increase in this taxon has previously been reported in adult humans with pneumonia by Akata et al (2016). We also found an increase in Haemophilus (Jacobs & Harris, 1979), Moraxella (Claesson & Leinonen, 1994), Neisseria (Johnson, Drew, & Roberts, 1981), and…”
Section: Inferences On Empirical Datasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Of the 53 taxa that we found shifted between sampling groups, the most dramatic change was in a Streptococcus taxon, which was much more abundant in aspirating children ( Figure S19). An increase in this taxon has previously been reported in adult humans with pneumonia by Akata et al (2016). We also found an increase in Haemophilus (Jacobs & Harris, 1979), Moraxella (Claesson & Leinonen, 1994), Neisseria (Johnson, Drew, & Roberts, 1981), and…”
Section: Inferences On Empirical Datasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of this study imply that the laryngopharynx of the elderly with fewer teeth, poorer dental hygiene, and more dental caries experience is constantly exposed to bacterial populations containing a higher relative abundance of group I commensals. Although Prevotella , Veillonella , and Streptococcus are not typical respiratory pathogens, they were identified as etiologic agents of pulmonary infections such as aspiration pneumonia ( 22 ) and lung abscesses ( 23 ). Our prospective cohort study demonstrated that a higher relative abundance of group I commensals on the tongue was implicated in an increased mortality risk from pneumonia in frail elderly adults in nursing homes ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous reports investigating pneumonia showed that there was a higher ratio of patients with mixed infections of healthcare‐associated pneumonia (HCAP) and hospital‐acquired pneumonia (HAP) compared to patients with community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). In addition, streptococci were highly detected in elderly pneumonia patients and pneumonia patients with poor general health conditions . In patients with bacterial pleuritis, culture‐based mixed infection was reported in 9.8%–24.0% of patients, with insufficient data detailing the combination of bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, streptococci were highly detected in elderly pneumonia patients and pneumonia patients with poor general health conditions. [14][15][16]26 In patients with bacterial pleuritis, culture-based mixed infection was reported in 9.8%-24.0% 25,27,28 of patients, with insufficient data detailing the combination of bacterial species. In this study, 10 patients were categorized in the 'mixed bacterial-dominant' group and 9 of 10 (90%) patients in the 'mixed bacterial dominant' group were also sorted into the obligate anaerobic group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%