Abstract:We investigate to what degree employee representatives contribute to the board's monitoring of earnings quality. We argue that employee representatives have incentives to prevent earnings manipulations motivated by negotiation considerations. Furthermore, they seek risk reducing policies, have a long-term interest in their firm and possess firm-specific knowledge, which in turn can result in improved earnings quality. Employee representation also increases the diversity on the board, which can enhance the boar… Show more
“…Instead, it is considered to take place in loose networks of social interactions between actors, which address mutual interests (Latour 1987). ANT may therefore be a useful tool for studying AHR networks, and can compensate for some of the drawbacks of legitimacy theory, which favours specific stakeholders (Parker 2005). It may provide insights into the process required to create knowledge and network dynamics and achieve common objectives (Chua 1995).…”
Section: Critical Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
This paper examines previous literature on accounting for corporate human rights (AHR) to identify the main research themes and development, conduct critical evaluations and open up new pathways towards future research. A structured literature review was conducted using 164 relevant published journal articles. Data were from the Scopus database over the last 22 years. The majority of research on AHR focuses on strategy/management and non‐discrimination themes, with little research in other areas such as child labour. Research in this field is at an early stage, with more focus on adoption and implementation issues. There is a need for more in‐depth and grounding analysis on the power networks among participants in broader institutional systems to provide more understanding of the underlying mechanisms. This paper discusses several suggestions such as alternative accounting and networking models to support the field, debates possible remedies to overcome drawbacks and presents options for future research. Several useful practical implications are provided for academics, corporate managers and regulators to bridge the gap between accounting and human rights practices and to enhance corporate social responsibility.
“…Instead, it is considered to take place in loose networks of social interactions between actors, which address mutual interests (Latour 1987). ANT may therefore be a useful tool for studying AHR networks, and can compensate for some of the drawbacks of legitimacy theory, which favours specific stakeholders (Parker 2005). It may provide insights into the process required to create knowledge and network dynamics and achieve common objectives (Chua 1995).…”
Section: Critical Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
This paper examines previous literature on accounting for corporate human rights (AHR) to identify the main research themes and development, conduct critical evaluations and open up new pathways towards future research. A structured literature review was conducted using 164 relevant published journal articles. Data were from the Scopus database over the last 22 years. The majority of research on AHR focuses on strategy/management and non‐discrimination themes, with little research in other areas such as child labour. Research in this field is at an early stage, with more focus on adoption and implementation issues. There is a need for more in‐depth and grounding analysis on the power networks among participants in broader institutional systems to provide more understanding of the underlying mechanisms. This paper discusses several suggestions such as alternative accounting and networking models to support the field, debates possible remedies to overcome drawbacks and presents options for future research. Several useful practical implications are provided for academics, corporate managers and regulators to bridge the gap between accounting and human rights practices and to enhance corporate social responsibility.
“…In other words, the problem of adverse selection arising from the advantage of information becomes an essential factor for some enterprises to defeat the original purpose of the government's innovation incentive policy. Some studies found an internal drive to manipulate R&D investment for tax incentive reduction and expectation adjustment (Overland & Samani, 2021;Liu, et al, 2021). Overall, it is essential to understand and explore the motivations for corporate R&D manipulation to help drive the implementation of "genuine innovation" towards a virtuous cycle.…”
R&D manipulation is a subjective manipulation of R&D accounting accounts by management that ignores the facts about R&D. It has a negative impact on the innovation performance of the company as well as the decision-making activities of external stakeholders. Hence, it is crucial to seek solutions to control this dishonest behaviour accurately. In recent years, the phenomenon of common institutional ownership has become increasingly widespread in the capital markets and has a significant impact on the strategic decisions of companies. There are currently two views on the corporate governance role of common institutional ownership: the synergistic governance effect and the collusive fraud effect. This paper selects Chinese A-share listed firms from 2009-2021 as a research sample to examine the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate R&D manipulation. The study found that common institutional ownership can inhibit corporate R&D manipulation. The higher the degree of their linkage and the greater the shareholding, the more pronounced the synergistic effect. The findings remained valid after testing using propensity score matching (PSM) and changing the sample period. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the inhibiting effect of common institutional ownership on corporate R&D manipulation is more pronounced in high-tech firms and firms which stay in the growth and maturity stage. This paper enriches the research on the economic consequences of common institutional ownership and provides management implications for implementing the innovation-driven strategy in China.
“…Even though many companies reportedly consider employee involvement as a positive aspect of organisational development, implementation is usually problematic because of the lack of a meaningful agenda (“why we are involving employees?”) and underdeveloped means (“how we are doing so?”) (Overland & Samani, 2021; Rees et al, 2013). From an accountability perspective, workplace democracy begins by providing employees with instruments to control organisational conduct and hold managerial power to account (Battilana & Casciaro, 2021; Warren, 2014).…”
Section: Accountability and A Democratic Workplace Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and underdeveloped means ("how we are doing so?") (Overland & Samani, 2021;Rees et al, 2013). From an accountability perspective, workplace democracy begins by providing employees with instruments to control organisational conduct and hold managerial power to account (Battilana & Casciaro, 2021;Warren, 2014).…”
Section: Accountability and A Democratic Workplace Setupmentioning
Roberto Frega argues for the advancement of workplace democracy theorisation by synergising the conceptual pathways of various disciplines. He places a particular emphasis on the practice of employee involvement, which, according to him, constitutes one of the three pillars of workplace democracy, the other two being voice and representation. The present commentary broadens the interdisciplinary horizons of this debate by reflecting on the central role of accountability in workplace democracy and the workings of the three pillars identified by Frega. The commentary explores the potential of accountability and the insights drawn from critical accounting research to translate democratic ideals into meaningful and sustainable organisational practices and so strengthen workplace democracy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.