1989
DOI: 10.1080/00224498909551510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sexuality scale: An instrument to measure sexual‐esteem, sexual‐depression, and sexual‐preoccupation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
194
1
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
194
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The same thing happened with sexual preoccupation, which was especially related to desire. This may be due to the fact that the questionnaire used (Snell & Papini, 1989) labels a series of questions related to sexual desire as preoccupation. We also found that dissatisfaction with sexual life is related to sociosexual desire but not to past behavior or to attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same thing happened with sexual preoccupation, which was especially related to desire. This may be due to the fact that the questionnaire used (Snell & Papini, 1989) labels a series of questions related to sexual desire as preoccupation. We also found that dissatisfaction with sexual life is related to sociosexual desire but not to past behavior or to attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexuality Scale (SS; Snell & Papini, 1989). This scale consists of 15 items assessing perceptions of one's own sexuality on three components: self-esteem as sexual partner (e.g., "…”
Section: Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale (Ssss;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we used the Sexuality Scale (Snell & Papini, 1989) to capture sexual esteem (10 items; e.g., "I would rate my sexual skill quite highly") and sexual depression (10 items; e.g., "I am depressed about the sexual aspects of my life") using the same response scale as for the MSPQ. Finally, we used the sex life satisfaction subscale of the Extended Satisfaction With Life Scale (Alfonso, Allison, Rader, & Gorman, 1996) to capture participants' satisfaction with their sex life (5 items; e.g., "In most ways my sex life is close to my ideal") with participants responding on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, schema scores display concurrent validity in association with other individual differences related to the sexual domain, including such behavioral-attitudinal constructs as sociosexuality (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991); affective constructs such as erotophobia-erotophilia (Fisher, White, Byrne, & Kelly, 1988); and alternate cognitive constructs such as sexual esteem (Snell, Fisher, & Schuh, 1992;Snell & Papini, 1989). Our data indicate that sexual self-schema scores predictably correlate with, yet do not overlap, these alternate sexual constructs (Andersen & Cyranowski, 1995).…”
Section: Other Sources Of Concurrent Validitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For example, negative-schema women report lower levels of sexual desire (as measured by the Sexual Responsiveness Scale; Andersen, Andersen & deProsse, 1989), and are less preoccupied with sexual thoughts (as assessed with the Sexuality Scale; Snell & Papini, 1989). In other words, women with negative sexual selfschemas report relatively less interest in sexual activity and fewer sexual thoughts or fantasies than women with positive sexual self-views (Andersen & Cyranowski, 1994;Cyranowski & Andersen, 1998a).…”
Section: Women's Sexual Behavior and Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%