2017
DOI: 10.1080/0092623x.2017.1335665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tridimensional Structure of Sociosexuality: Spanish Validation of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows the same factor structure as in the original language and good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha). Although the cross-loadings were very small, we found that the ESEM fit was better than the CFA fit (e.g., Barrada, Castro, Correa, & Ruiz-Gómez, 2018). We detected an important degree of redundancy among two pairs of items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It shows the same factor structure as in the original language and good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha). Although the cross-loadings were very small, we found that the ESEM fit was better than the CFA fit (e.g., Barrada, Castro, Correa, & Ruiz-Gómez, 2018). We detected an important degree of redundancy among two pairs of items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Cronbach's alphas obtained in this study were 0.84 for the Behavioral factor (95% CI [0.82, 0.87]); 0.79 for the Attitudinal factor (95% CI [0.76, 0.81]); and 0.84 for the Desire factor (95% CI [0.82, 0.86]). We used the Spanish validation of Barrada et al (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial sample comprised 1996 participants. Four inclusion criteria were used: (1) studying a university degree at the time of data collection (76 participants excluded); (2) aged between 18 to 26 years, according to criteria from previous studies with university samples [29][30][31] (128 participants excluded); (3) labeling themselves as woman or man (13 participants excluded; the small sample size of this group prevented us from incorporating these participants to our analyses); and (4) correctly answering a control question (74 participants excluded; see below).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%