2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
1
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
130
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the 28-item servant leadership scale developed by Liden et al (2008). Higher-order CFAs have shown that the 7 dimensions assessed with this scale load onto a second-order factor capturing overall/global servant leadership (Chiniara & Bentein, 2018;Hu & Liden, 2011). A sample item is, "My manager provides me with work experiences that enable me to develop new skills" ( = .92).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the 28-item servant leadership scale developed by Liden et al (2008). Higher-order CFAs have shown that the 7 dimensions assessed with this scale load onto a second-order factor capturing overall/global servant leadership (Chiniara & Bentein, 2018;Hu & Liden, 2011). A sample item is, "My manager provides me with work experiences that enable me to develop new skills" ( = .92).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most difficult part is to understand how such learning outcomes expressed in leadership and professional skills could be achieved at either basic or advanced level and later assessed. The central leadership creation task is consistent with this dynamic conceptualization of team effectiveness (Chiniara and Bentein 2018). In this sense, team leadership includes all processes that improve team effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Additionally, our study makes a methodological contribution to the LMX differentiation literature. Prior to this study, PLMXD was captured either using indirect individual‐source measures (Epitropaki et al ., ; Hooper & Martin, ; Yuan & Jian, ) or direct individual‐source measures (Chiniara & Bentein, ; Van Breukelen et al ., ). PLMXD had not been captured through an experimental design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sias and Jablin () discussed how differences in perceived differential treatment can increase communication among co‐workers. More recently, Chiniara and Bentein () found that low levels of PLMXD strengthened team cohesion, which in turn positively influenced team task performance and service‐oriented organizational citizenship behaviours. It has also been suggested that employees with low LMX levels who perceive that differentiation exists within their workgroup may recognize that there is an opportunity to change their status and develop better relationships with their leader (Kauppila, ; Liden, Erdogan, Wayne, & Sparrowe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%