2011
DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Serotonin Transporter Promoter Variant (5-HTTLPR), Stress, and Depression Meta-analysis Revisited

Abstract: Context The initial report of an interaction between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and stress in the development of depression is perhaps the best-known and most cited finding in psychiatric genetics. Two recent meta-analyses explored the studies seeking to replicate this initial report and concluded that the evidence did not support the presence of the interaction. However, even the larger of the meta-analyses included only 14 of the 56 studies that have explored the relationship be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

65
1,093
11
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,251 publications
(1,189 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
65
1,093
11
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, altered HPA-axis activity and altered cortisol response has been found to be associated with increased risk for developing depression (Burke et al 2005;Cowen 2010;Harkness et al 2011;Luby et al 2004) and altering cognitive processes (El Hage et al 2009;Erickson et al 2003;Huffziger and Kuehner 2009). Furthermore, an interaction between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and stress in the development of depression has been repeatedly reported with a recent meta-analysis of 54 studies showing strong evidence that 5-HTTLPR moderates the relationship between stress and depression, with the 5-HTTLPR s allele associated with an increased risk of developing depression under stress (P = .00002) (Karg et al 2011). Indeed, victimized children who later develop clinically significant symptoms show systematic differences in the expression of depression-linked genes (e.g.5-HTTLPR) compared to those who remain symptom-free or exhibit only transient symptoms (Sugden et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, altered HPA-axis activity and altered cortisol response has been found to be associated with increased risk for developing depression (Burke et al 2005;Cowen 2010;Harkness et al 2011;Luby et al 2004) and altering cognitive processes (El Hage et al 2009;Erickson et al 2003;Huffziger and Kuehner 2009). Furthermore, an interaction between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and stress in the development of depression has been repeatedly reported with a recent meta-analysis of 54 studies showing strong evidence that 5-HTTLPR moderates the relationship between stress and depression, with the 5-HTTLPR s allele associated with an increased risk of developing depression under stress (P = .00002) (Karg et al 2011). Indeed, victimized children who later develop clinically significant symptoms show systematic differences in the expression of depression-linked genes (e.g.5-HTTLPR) compared to those who remain symptom-free or exhibit only transient symptoms (Sugden et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the effects of early-life stress may interact with heritable variation in serotonergic genes to shape individual differences in anxiety and depression risk. Within humans, variants that affect serotonergic function, such as the serotonin transporter polymorphism, interact with early-life stress to shape disease susceptibility (Caspi et al, 2003;Karg et al, 2011;Kendler et al, 2005). Similarly, phenotypes displayed by animal models of altered serotonergic function, such as 5-HTT and 5-HT1A knockout mice, are sensitive to environmental exposure (Carola and Gross, 2012;Zanettini et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, inclusive meta-analyses from Karg et al (2011) (k = 54) and Sharpley et al (2014) (k = 81) both reach positive conclusions, with Sharpley et al (2014) showing that the meta-analytic effect emerges across four separate design subtypes. Karg et al (2011) show that differences between the negative meta-analyses and theirs are due to paper selection, not meta-analytic technique. Papers selected for their statistically homogeneous designs tend to have methodological flaws including retrospective lifetime stress and depression assessment (Moffitt & Caspi, 2014) leading to confounding (Uher & McGuffin, 2010).…”
Section: Biased Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Papers selected for their statistically homogeneous designs tend to have methodological flaws including retrospective lifetime stress and depression assessment (Moffitt & Caspi, 2014) leading to confounding (Uher & McGuffin, 2010). Moreover, Karg et al (2011) show that reports with more robust measures of stress (interview and Zhang (2009a) 'In addition, the individuals carrying the L/L genotype of 5-HTTLPR could be susceptible to MDD when exposed to negative life events and MDD in the Chinese population' 5-HTTLPR, Serotonin transporter gene; RD, risk difference; CI, confidence interval; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MDD, major depressive disorder; G × E, gene-environment interaction.…”
Section: Biased Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%