2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04591-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The seroprevalence of Bartonella spp. in the blood of patients with musculoskeletal complaints and blood donors, Poland: a pilot study

Abstract: Background Bartonella spp. can cause a variety of diseases, such as lymphadenopathies, cat scratch disease, and trench fever, but can also give rise to many non-specific symptoms. No data exists regarding the prevalence of Bartonella spp. in patients with musculoskeletal complaints, nor among blood donors in Poland.Methods The presence of anti-Bartonella IgM and IgG in the serum of blood donors (n = 65) (Lodz, Poland) and in the patients of the Department of Rheumatology Clinic (n = 40) suffering from musculos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study from Poland, seroprevalence in healthy blood donors was compared with that in rheumatoid patients with unexplained musculoskeletal symptoms. Overall, 23% of the samples tested were positive for antibodies, but no significantly higher frequency was found in rheumatoid patients, in persons previously scratched by a cat, or in persons with a history of tick bites [51]. Different results were obtained in an earlier study from Poland, where persons at increased risk for tick bites (farmers, forestry workers) were seropositive in 30.4% of cases, but the control group was "only" 8.9% [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In a study from Poland, seroprevalence in healthy blood donors was compared with that in rheumatoid patients with unexplained musculoskeletal symptoms. Overall, 23% of the samples tested were positive for antibodies, but no significantly higher frequency was found in rheumatoid patients, in persons previously scratched by a cat, or in persons with a history of tick bites [51]. Different results were obtained in an earlier study from Poland, where persons at increased risk for tick bites (farmers, forestry workers) were seropositive in 30.4% of cases, but the control group was "only" 8.9% [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…has been previously detected in veterinary practitioners by a cPCR method targeting the ITS gene [ 43 ] and on cat owners from Spain (using the same method) [ 30 ], with a prevalence of 28% and 27%, respectively. For serology assessments, an incidence of 7% was reported for B. henselae and 1% for B. quintana on a survey performed in Sweden, with a sample of 224 patients [ 44 ], while another survey performed in Poland had a reported incidence of 23% seropositive cases for B. henselae and 2.85% for B. quintana from 105 tested subjects, composed of 65 blood donors and 40 patients suffering from musculoskeletal symptoms [ 45 ]. Despite these reports, the samples screened in the present study were negative for the bacteria, also including the blood cultured samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA in ticks and, more recently, the reports of Bartonella spp. seroprevalence in tick-exposed patients from Sweden and Poland, although the last one lacked statistical significance [ 44 , 45 ], which has put them on the spot [ 50 ]. In the present study, despite sampling over 260 ticks collected in different locations across Portugal mainland, Bartonella sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the prevalence of Bartonella infections in humans varies from 0.2% to 30% on average, depending on the investigated group and the diagnostic method used. For example, in a study conducted in Germany, the seropositivity rates among the healthy adults are 30%, in Greece 19.8%, in Poland 25.85%, in Austria 26.5%, in Sweden 16%, and 8.7% in Spain [25,[34][35][36]. On the other hand, bartonellosis in Slovakia is not subject to mandatory reporting and, therefore, it is not possible to accurately determine incidence and prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%