2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: A case study in Seattle, WA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite a few methods have been developed for estimating current parking occupancies and parking demand, Ottosson et al (2013) discovered that parking occupancies estimated directly from aggregating transactions (namely every parker leaves exactly at the time ticket expiration) are generally lower than their actual observations, and such discrepancies are substantial in some cases. Similar conclusion was reached in a study comparing data from parking kiosks and actual counts for major paid parking blocks in Seattle (Seattle, 2011b,a), where the estimation error varies from 6% to 55%, and occupancies derived from transactions always being lower than the counted data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few methods have been developed for estimating current parking occupancies and parking demand, Ottosson et al (2013) discovered that parking occupancies estimated directly from aggregating transactions (namely every parker leaves exactly at the time ticket expiration) are generally lower than their actual observations, and such discrepancies are substantial in some cases. Similar conclusion was reached in a study comparing data from parking kiosks and actual counts for major paid parking blocks in Seattle (Seattle, 2011b,a), where the estimation error varies from 6% to 55%, and occupancies derived from transactions always being lower than the counted data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ottosson et al (2013) has shown the potential to vary parking prices by time of day within a geographic area and Caicedo (2012) to have pay by the minute parking. In addition, the growing range of mobility services such as car sharing mean that incorporating car share into residential parking standards is now an important issue (Engel-Yan andPassmore, 2013 andShaheen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target occupancy rate was chosen to be 71-86% in this experiment. Ottosson et al (2013) provide the main findings of the experiment. They obtain price elasticity of parking demand by time of the day and neighborhood characteristics.…”
Section: Toward Temporal-spatial Pricing Of Parkingmentioning
confidence: 99%