The Semantics of Case in Russian Secondary Predication

Filip, Hana

doi:10.3765/salt.v11i0.2852

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…и тв.п. в именном сказуемом[Nichols, 1981; Козинский, 1983;Franks, 1995;Bailyn, 2001;Filip, 2001; Strigin, Demjjanow, 2001;Grebenyova, 2005;Madariaga, 2007; Гращенков, 2018]. Для наших целей важно, что форма тв.…”

unclassified

Vestn. Moscow. Un-Ta. Ser. 9. Philology. 2022. No. 6. 1-240.

2023

Moscow University Bulletin Series 9 PHILOLOGY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Зам. главного редактора по лингвистике -КОБОЗЕВА Ирина Михайловна, д.ф.н., проф. кафедры теоретической и прикладной лингвистики филологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова Зам. главного редактора по литературоведению -ТОЛМАЧЁВ Василий Михайлович, д.ф.н., проф., зав. кафедрой истории зарубежной литературы филологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова Отв. секретарь по лингвистике -КНЯЗЕВ Сергей Владимирович, д.ф.н., проф., ведущий научный сотрудник отдела диалектологии и лингвистической географии Института русского языка имени В.В. Виноградова РАН Отв. секретарь по литературоведению -ЗЫКОВА Галина Владимировна, д.ф.н., проф. кафедры истории новейшей русской литературы и современного литературного процесса филологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова Оргсекретарь -БЕЛАВИНА Екатерина Михайловна, к.ф.н., доц. кафедры французского языкознания филологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова

show abstract

unclassified

Vestn. Moscow. Un-Ta. Ser. 9. Philology. 2022. No. 6. 1-240.

2023

Moscow University Bulletin Series 9 PHILOLOGY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Secondary Predication

Rothstein

2017

The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter discusses secondary predication primarily from a syntactic perspective. We describe the two major types of secondary predicates, depictives and resultatives , proposing that so‐called circumstantials should be identified as depictives under the scope of a modal operator. We show that secondary predication, unlike clausal predication, is adjunct predication and is always thematic, with the secondary predicate assigning an external theta‐role to its subject. What makes the predication secondary is that the subject of the secondary predicate must be independently theta‐marked by another lexical head. We contrast secondary predication with clausal predication, and argue that there is no evidence to support a small clause analysis of secondary predicates. Instead, secondary predicates should be analyzed as AP (or PP) adjuncts that directly modify their subject. We review the syntactic position of these adjuncts, showing that they must be c‐commanded by their subjects. We also review the lexical constraints on choice of depictives and resultatives, and discuss briefly the semantic contrasts between them. Crucially, this explains the fact that while depictives can be predicated of either sentential subjects or direct objects, resultatives can only be predicated of VP‐internal arguments. We conclude by reviewing some recent publications on the topic.

show abstract

On adjectives and adverbs expressing ‘nakedness’ and ‘barefootedness’ in Polish and Russian: a study on morphosyntactic variation

Renz

Hentschel

2010

Russ Linguist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Polish and Russian, adjectives and adverbs occur in several syntactic functions, among others as adjuncts (i.e. as 'secondary predicates' and as adverbials) and, in copula clauses, as (primary) predicates. The choice between adjective and adverb is governed by certain syntacto-semantic factors: adjectives in these syntactic positions usually occur with orientation towards a noun phrase that denotes a first-order entity (i.e. an 'object' or a person), whereas adverbs usually exhibit orientation towards a higherorder entity (i.e. an event or a proposition). Adverbs denoting a lack of clothing, however, seem to be-at least to a certain degree-an exception to this rule, since they occur with semantic orientation towards personal referents in-seemingly free-variation with corresponding adjectival forms. This paper investigates these cases of morphosyntactic variation, examining to what extent they are indeed instances of free variation and how far semiotic factors like transparency and indexicality influence the choice of either adjective or adverb.Аннотация В русском и польском языках прилагательные и наречия могут за-нимать различные синтаксические позиции, в том числе позицию адъюнктов (т.е. 'вторичных предикатов' и обстоятельств), а в предложениях со связкой-позицию первичных предикатов (сказуемых). Выбор между прилагательным и наречием зави-сит от определенных синтактико-семантических факторов: прилагательные в этих позициях относятся, как правило, к именной группе, обозначающей сущность пер-вого порядка (т.е. 'вещь' или лицо), в то время как наречия обычно демонстри-руют отнесенность к сущностям высшего порядка (т.е. к событиям или пропо-зициям). Своего рода исключение, как нам представляется, составляют наречия, обозначающие отсутствие одежды. Такие наречия, семантически ориентированные на личных референтов, допускают свободную вариативность с соответствующими M. Renz ( ) · G. Hentschel

show abstract

The Semantics of Case in Russian Secondary Predication

Cited by 5 publications

References 29 publications

Vestn. Moscow. Un-Ta. Ser. 9. Philology. 2022. No. 6. 1-240.

Vestn. Moscow. Un-Ta. Ser. 9. Philology. 2022. No. 6. 1-240.

Secondary Predication

On adjectives and adverbs expressing ‘nakedness’ and ‘barefootedness’ in Polish and Russian: a study on morphosyntactic variation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About