1990
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Self‐injury Trauma (Sit) Scale: A Method for Quantifying Surface Tissue Damage Caused by Self‐injurious Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes are summed to then yield a severity index score. While the SIT scale has high face validity and does show promise in the area of tracking outcomes of interventions, even the developers caution its use as a “stand alone” method of assessment and progress monitoring 57. Other drawbacks of the SIT scale include: it is fairly time-consuming, the inability to utilize with other destructive behavior (eg, aggression) that may occur in combination with SIB, and the questionable utility of the risk estimates produced by the measure when compared to outcomes from a less time-consuming or formal evaluation 58…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Sibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes are summed to then yield a severity index score. While the SIT scale has high face validity and does show promise in the area of tracking outcomes of interventions, even the developers caution its use as a “stand alone” method of assessment and progress monitoring 57. Other drawbacks of the SIT scale include: it is fairly time-consuming, the inability to utilize with other destructive behavior (eg, aggression) that may occur in combination with SIB, and the questionable utility of the risk estimates produced by the measure when compared to outcomes from a less time-consuming or formal evaluation 58…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Sibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quanto à avaliação de fotografias das áreas lesionadas da pele, os autores afirmaram que as fotos das áreas com escoriações na fase pós-intervenção foram melhor avaliadas do que aquelas tiradas das mesmas áreas na pré-intervenção. Dados semelhantes foram obtidos por meio da escala SITS (Self Injury Trauma Scale; Iwata, Pace, Kissel, Nau, & Farber, 1990).…”
Section: Análise Qualitativa Dos Resultados Dos Estudosunclassified
“…One of the first inventories to be developed for the assessment of self-injurious behaviors is the SITS created by Iwata, Pace, and Kissel (1990). It was created to evaluate the extent of tissue damage caused by self-injury.…”
Section: Self-injury Trauma Scale (Sits)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also permits differentiation of self-injury according to topography, location of the injury on the body, type of injury, number of injuries, and estimates of severity through evaluation of the injuries themselves. Test-retest reliability was reported at r = .68 (Iwata et al, 1990). This assessment was later used to evaluate self-injury in conjunction with physical pain as based on the proposition that the experience and expression of pain is somehow different among those individuals who self-injure, therefore leading to the acceptability and tolerability of self-injury as a behavior (Symons & Danov, 2005).…”
Section: Self-injury Trauma Scale (Sits)mentioning
confidence: 99%