1998
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners.

Abstract: The authors hypothesized a self-fulfilling prophecy wherein rejection expectancies lead people to behave in ways that elicit rejection from their dating partners. The hypothesis was tested in 2 studies of conflict in couples: (a) a longitudinal field study where couples provided daily-diary reports and (b) a lab study involving behavioral observations. Results from the field study showed that high rejection-sensitive (HRS) people's relationships were more likely to break up than those of low rejection-sensitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
571
1
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 584 publications
(613 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(102 reference statements)
22
571
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationships of individuals with high sensitivity to rejection are more prone to break -ups, with higher relationship erosion than for individuals with low sensitivity to rejection (Downey, Freitas, Michaelis & Khouri, 1998). A lack of problem-solving skills in individuals with high sensitivity to rejection may cause their partner's negative responses and their own perception distortions regarding the relationship.…”
Section: According To Both the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships of individuals with high sensitivity to rejection are more prone to break -ups, with higher relationship erosion than for individuals with low sensitivity to rejection (Downey, Freitas, Michaelis & Khouri, 1998). A lack of problem-solving skills in individuals with high sensitivity to rejection may cause their partner's negative responses and their own perception distortions regarding the relationship.…”
Section: According To Both the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step involves going from simply describing people's patterns (e.g., Sally is less agreeable around strangers than around friends) to explaining them (e.g., Sally feels anxious around strangers, which causes her to act disagreeable). One empirical example of this type of research is Downey's work on rejection sensitivity (Downey & Feldman, 1996;Downey, Freitas, Michaelis, & Khouri, 1998;Downey, Mougios, Ayduk, London, & Shoda, 2004). These studies indicate that people high in rejection sensitivity are more likely to interpret ambiguous information (e.g., a partner leaving the experiment) as rejection and this cognitive interpretation leads to the self-fulfilling prophecy, where rejection sensitivity ultimately leads to unsatisfying romantic relationships and dissolution (Downey & Feldman, 1996;Downey et al, 1998).…”
Section: What Processes Mediate the Effect Of Triggers On Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One empirical example of this type of research is Downey's work on rejection sensitivity (Downey & Feldman, 1996;Downey, Freitas, Michaelis, & Khouri, 1998;Downey, Mougios, Ayduk, London, & Shoda, 2004). These studies indicate that people high in rejection sensitivity are more likely to interpret ambiguous information (e.g., a partner leaving the experiment) as rejection and this cognitive interpretation leads to the self-fulfilling prophecy, where rejection sensitivity ultimately leads to unsatisfying romantic relationships and dissolution (Downey & Feldman, 1996;Downey et al, 1998). This is an example of moderated mediation, where the trigger (i.e., ambiguous partner behavior) causes people high in rejection sensitivity (i.e., moderator) to engage in the self-fulfilling prophecy (i.e., moderated mediator), which leads to negative relationship outcomes.…”
Section: What Processes Mediate the Effect Of Triggers On Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social scientists call this behavior the Self Fulfilling Prophecy. (Downey et al, 1998). But that gift has a dark side when confronted with power shift at the Board level.…”
Section: Smoke Gets In Your Eyes"mentioning
confidence: 99%