2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp01238d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self- and foreign-absorption continua of water vapor by cavity ring-down spectroscopy near 2.35 μm

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the OF‐CEAS cell is filled with water vapor, the total absorption coefficient can be expressed as a sum of three terms: αtot(),νT=αcavity+αnormalWnormalMnormalL+αnormalWnormalCnormalS where α cavity , α WML , and α WCS are the contributions due to the cavity, water vapor monomer local lines (WML), and water vapor self‐continuum (WCS), Rayleigh scattering contribution being negligible in the considered region [ Mondelain et al ., ]. In the following we will assume that the cavity losses, α cavity , are unaffected by the injection of water and correspond then to those of the evacuated cavity.…”
Section: Of‐ceas In the 4 µM Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When the OF‐CEAS cell is filled with water vapor, the total absorption coefficient can be expressed as a sum of three terms: αtot(),νT=αcavity+αnormalWnormalMnormalL+αnormalWnormalCnormalS where α cavity , α WML , and α WCS are the contributions due to the cavity, water vapor monomer local lines (WML), and water vapor self‐continuum (WCS), Rayleigh scattering contribution being negligible in the considered region [ Mondelain et al ., ]. In the following we will assume that the cavity losses, α cavity , are unaffected by the injection of water and correspond then to those of the evacuated cavity.…”
Section: Of‐ceas In the 4 µM Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this window, the measurements were performed at spectral points around 4350 and 4520 cm −1 , intermediate between those of our previous OF‐CEAS and CRDS measurements near 4300 cm −1 and the OF‐CEAS measurements at the center of the window at 4723 cm −1 [ Mondelain et al ., ; Ventrillard et al ., ]. The 4350 and 4520 cm −1 measurements were performed with a Distributed Feedback (DFB) diode laser similar to the laser source used in Mondelain et al .…”
Section: Crds With Vecsel and Dfb Laser Diode In The 21 µM Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another issue is that laboratory measurements performed by different techniques have yielded too inconsistent results. For example, the magnitude of the self-continuum in NIR windows derived from laboratory FTIR spectrometry is higher by about 1 order or magnitude compared to results obtained by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS; Mondelain et al, 2013Mondelain et al, , 2015, which furthermore differ significantly from laboratory results obtained by calorimetric interferometry (Bicknell et al, 2006). Finally, a drawback of laboratory measurements is that they are typically performed at least at room temperature or even heated, in order to detect the weak continuum absorption in the limited optical path length of the cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%