1966
DOI: 10.2307/1388304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Self and Cognitive Balance: Improvements in Balance Theory's Predictive Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining inconsistent stimuli as those experiences having a content or meaning that is either unrelated to or descriptive of the opposite of some aspect of the self-structure, Cartwright attempted to measure the consistency between experience (stimuli) and the self-concept as reflected in three different types of experiences (stimuli): nonsense syllables, adjectives, and names of possessions. Hodges (1966), more so than other cognitive self-consistency researchers, contends that the self as conceived by Cooley (1902), Mead (1934), and Burrows (1953) can be conceptualized as a principle of balance. Hodges attempted to test explicitly the theoretical principles of balance theory as they relate to the cognitive structuring of the self.…”
Section: Self-concept: a Cognitive Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defining inconsistent stimuli as those experiences having a content or meaning that is either unrelated to or descriptive of the opposite of some aspect of the self-structure, Cartwright attempted to measure the consistency between experience (stimuli) and the self-concept as reflected in three different types of experiences (stimuli): nonsense syllables, adjectives, and names of possessions. Hodges (1966), more so than other cognitive self-consistency researchers, contends that the self as conceived by Cooley (1902), Mead (1934), and Burrows (1953) can be conceptualized as a principle of balance. Hodges attempted to test explicitly the theoretical principles of balance theory as they relate to the cognitive structuring of the self.…”
Section: Self-concept: a Cognitive Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is too simplistic and in fact doesn't reveal the true differences in cognitive structures. For one thing, one must recognize that if consistency is operationally defined as balanced units in the Heiderian sense and as represented in Hodges's (1966) study, then what may be consistent for one individual may be discrepant (in the sense of unbalanced unit relations) for another individual. For instance, it may be extremely important for some individuals to have at all times a strong positive unit relation between the "I" and "me" self-referents and the "we" self-referent; while for others having a very weak or none-at-all unit relation between the "I" and "me" self-referents and the "we" self-referent may be the necessary balanced cognitive-self organization to maintain.…”
Section: Differential Cognitive Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While balance theory may appear valid in some cases, it is noticeably deficient in others. Zajonc (cited in Hodges, 1966) observed that regardless of how much a child likes Popeye, they may very much dislike spinach, contrary to balance theory's predictions. Zajonc also reported a comment by Festinger, who noted that according to balance theory, if someone likes chicken and chickens like chicken feed, the person should come to like chicken feed as well or else face some aversive imbalance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%