The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods

Stević, Željko; Pamučar, Dragan; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras; Ćirović, Goran; Prentkovskis, Olegas

doi:10.3390/sym9110264

Cited by 113 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(46 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, the Rough BWM makes it possible to bridge the existing gap that exists in the BWM methodology by applying a new approach in treating imprecision that is based on RN. This approach has been used in several studies in a very short time [53][54][55], therefore its complete algorithm has not been shown in this paper. The Rough BWM model in [53] is used to determine weight coefficients of the criteria for location selection for wind farms, while in [54], it is used to determine the importance of the criteria for selecting wagons for a logistics company.…”

Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This approach has been used in several studies in a very short time [53][54][55], therefore its complete algorithm has not been shown in this paper. The Rough BWM model in [53] is used to determine weight coefficients of the criteria for location selection for wind farms, while in [54], it is used to determine the importance of the criteria for selecting wagons for a logistics company. Interval Rough fuzzy BWM has been applied in [55] to a study of the optimal selection of firefighting helicopters.…”

Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this purpose, the following methods were used: Rough SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) [54], Rough EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) [47], Rough MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) [74] and Rough TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) [75], Rough MAIRCA (Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) [76] and Rough VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) [77].…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An adequately functionally located traffic infrastructure is an important factor in the mobility of people because it affects the quality of traffic, safety and efficiency of carrying out transportation activities. Locating a roundabout on an urban network is an imperative for road engineering to address traffic problems such as reduction of traffic congestion, enhancement of security and sustainability, etc. Therefore, this paper evaluates potential locations for roundabout construction using Rough BWM (Best Worst Method) and Rough WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) models. Determination of relative criterion weights on the basis of which the potential locations were evaluated was carried out using the Rough BWM method. In this paper, in order to enable the most precise consensus for group decision-making, a Rough Hamy aggregator has been developed. The main advantage of the Hamy mean (HM) operator is that it can capture the interrelationships among multi-input arguments and can provide DMs more options. Until now, there is no research based on HM operator for aggregating imprecise and uncertain information. The obtained indicators are described through eight alternatives. The results show that the fifth and sixth alternatives are the locations that should have a priority in the construction of roundabouts from the perspective of sustainable development, which is confirmed throughout changes of parameter k and with comparing to other methods in the sensitivity analysis.

show abstract

Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The model presented in the paper is solved by using the following methods: rough SAW [39], rough EDAS [35], rough MABAC [32], rough VIKOR [47], rough MAIRCA [43] and rough MULTIMOORA [35]. Their results and comparison with the rough WASPAS approach are shown in Figure 2.…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…So far, rough BWM has been applied in several publications. A rough BWM model was applied for determining the importance of the criteria for selecting a wagon for a logistics company in [39]. The evaluation of suppliers can be executed using a new believable rough set approach which was developed in [40] and, according to the authors, it provided good results.…”

Section: Applications Of Rough Sets In Multiple Criteria Decision Makmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Rough WASPAS Approach for Supplier Selection in a Company Manufacturing PVC Carpentry Products

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The decision-making process requires the prior definition and fulfillment of certain factors, especially when it comes to complex areas such as supply chain management. One of the most important items in the initial phase of the supply chain, which strongly influences its further flow, is to decide on the most favorable supplier. In this paper a selection of suppliers in a company producing polyvinyl chloride (PVC) carpentry was made based on the new approach developed in the field of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The relative values of the weight coefficients of the criteria are calculated using the rough analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method. The evaluation and ranking of suppliers is carried out using the new rough weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method. In order to determine the stability of the model and the ability to apply the developed rough WASPAS approach, the paper analyzes its sensitivity, which involves changing the value of the coefficient λ in the first part. The second part of the sensitivity analysis relates to the application of different multi-criteria decision-making methods in combination with rough numbers that have been developed in the very recent past. The model presented in the paper is solved by using the following methods: rough Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), rough Evaluation based on Distancefrom Average Solution (EDAS), rough MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), rough Višekriterijumsko kompromisno rangiranje (VIKOR), rough MultiAttributiveIdeal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) and rough Multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA). In addition, in the third part of the sensitivity analysis, the Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) of the ranks obtained was calculated which confirms the applicability of all the proposed approaches. The proposed rough model allows the evaluation of alternatives despite the imprecision and lack of quantitative information in the information-management process.

show abstract

Analysis of supplier evaluation and selection strategies for sustainable collaboration: A combined approach of best–worst method and TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable collaboration between manufacturer and supplier has emerged as a crucial supply chain decision for increasing business efficiency. In this study, a theoretical framework is proposed that uses practice‐based view to analyze key performance indicators (KPIs) for developing sustainable collaboration. Further, the current study proposes a novel three‐phase supplier evaluation–selection model to assess the incumbent suppliers on basis of KPIs for showcasing the applicability of theoretical framework. The model uses best–worst method (BWM) in the first phase for generating weights of KPI, adopts the TODIM approach in the second phase for evaluation of suppliers, and develops a supplier classification grid in the third phase for analyzing the impact of each selection strategy to be adopted. The novelty of the study is in evaluation of suppliers based on the KPIs with consideration of desirability as well as the potentiality metric and in consideration of the selection strategies, namely, supplier retention, supplier development, and supplier switching. A case study of India's leading home appliances company is taken to demonstrate the application of the current study. The result of BWM reveals that in terms of supplier's potentiality, “quality” emerges as a strong KPI while KPI “information disclosure” gains more importance while considering supplier's desirability towards strengthening the sustainable relationship. The TODIM grid analysis result suggests that suppliers with high performance in both metrics clearly qualify as the best suppliers and must be retained, while the suppliers performing low in both areas must be switched. For suppliers with metric values in conflict with each other, a trade‐off analysis is needed. Important research and managerial implications are drawn from the validation of the proposed framework, which can be useful for researchers and practitioners.

show abstract

The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods

Cited by 113 publications

References 43 publications

The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator

The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator

A Novel Rough WASPAS Approach for Supplier Selection in a Company Manufacturing PVC Carpentry Products

Analysis of supplier evaluation and selection strategies for sustainable collaboration: A combined approach of best–worst method and TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About