The Selection of Policy Instruments: a Network-based Perspective

Abstract

A BST RA C T The concepts of policy instruments and policy networks have played important roles in recent theoretical development on public policy, as research in several nations attests. These notions, however, have largely been considered in isolation from each other. Here a simple typology of policy networks is used to help explain the selection of different kinds of instruments by governments. Several instrument characteristics are considered for the expected impact of network features on instrument selection, and a set of propositions is developed that matches degrees of network interconnectedness and cohesion with the choice of different kinds of instruments -such as regulations, subsidies, and covenants. Examples from different national and policy-sectoral contexts are used to indicate the plausibility of the argument. The article suggests that considering network attributes can be useful in understanding governments' choice of instruments and can strengthen extant discussions largely focused on such variables as learning and policy style.The two subjects of this article, policy networks and the choice of government instruments to be used to achieve policy objectives, have each received extensive attention by scholars. Nonetheless, the core ideas developed in each stream of research have been largely ignored in the other. 1 The purpose of the current article is to link these concepts as

A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation

“…Policy-makers may place different weight on certain performance criteria, in resonance with the political or social culture to which they are bound. Instrument choices can also be influenced by considerations and constraints in the political and societal context (Hood 1983) or by the attributes of the policy network (Bressers and O'Toole 1998), phenomena which we did not consider. Another limitation is the choice of adaptation examples, which focused on urban adaptation measures.…”

Understanding National Administrative Styles and Their Impact Upon Administrative Reform: A Neo-Institutional Model and Analysis

“…The context of the problem situation, its timing and the scope of actors it includes, are also cited as having significant potential impacts on the instrument choices taken by governments and the resulting pattern of such choices which comprise an implementation style (Linder and Peters 1989;and Bressers 1998).…”

Human capital and the role of networks : migration, inclusion and new qualification for a sustainable regional economy

“…All these networks, if these are company's networks such as clusters (Porter, 1998;; Rehfeld, 1994) or governance networks (Bressers & O´Toole, 1998) or the so called innovation networks such as the Triple Helix, the co-operation between universities, industry and government (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000), or even the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix, expended by civil society and media and culture-based public (Carayannis et al, 2012) have one element in common. They are in broader sense social networks.…”

“…Fürst and Schubert (1998) define networks as loosely coupled and highly branched organizations that refer to clearly defined subjects and a dispose of horizontal communication structures without strong hierarchies. Bressers et al (1998) refer to policy network relations and state, "The intensity of actors' interactions and the way in which objectives are distributed among the actors are the basic characteristics of network relations". Polanyi's (1944) idea of embeddedness, which was continued by Granovetter (Boshuizen, 2009), bases on the key terms trust and reciprocity and emphasizes that economic network relations are embedded in social network relations.…”