1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Seascale cluster: a probable explanation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They cannot, as suggested by Fear et al (1999), be attributed to social class as this was adjusted for in the analysis, though its effects on risk were slight. The findings therefore add to the evidence from many population mixing studies (reviewed in Kinlen, 1995;Doll, 1999), including a recent cohort study (Kinlen and Balkwill, 2001), that strongly support an infective basis in childhood leukaemia. Young children (aged 0-4 years) were of primary interest in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…They cannot, as suggested by Fear et al (1999), be attributed to social class as this was adjusted for in the analysis, though its effects on risk were slight. The findings therefore add to the evidence from many population mixing studies (reviewed in Kinlen, 1995;Doll, 1999), including a recent cohort study (Kinlen and Balkwill, 2001), that strongly support an infective basis in childhood leukaemia. Young children (aged 0-4 years) were of primary interest in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The most plausible explanation for these clusters is that childhood leukaemia is a rare response to a common infection and that population mixing between infected and susceptible individuals in these secluded areas produces localized epidemics of the relevant infection and a consequent increased risk of childhood leukaemia (Kinlen, 2000). Such an explanation would also account for the increased levels of childhood leukaemia that have been found after other instances of pronounced urban-rural population mixing in areas with no enhanced exposure to radiation (Doll, 1999;Kinlen, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The findings confirm those of a recent study in rural Scotland, and also suggest that unusual population mixing (as occurred in Scotland as a result of the North Sea oil industry) is not a necessary requirement for the effect, since comparable mixing has not been a feature of rural Sweden. Kinlen, 1995;Doll, 1999), most recently in a cohort study (Kinlen and Balkwill, 2001). Such rural 'mixing' situations would tend to promote epidemics of an underlying infection by increasing the level of contacts between susceptible and infected individuals, the former being more prevalent in rural areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%