2012
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fit for Delivery study: rationale for the recommendations and test‐retest reliability of a dietary score measuring adherence to 10 specific recommendations for prevention of excessive weight gain during pregnancy

Abstract: Aiming at preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy, 10 specific dietary recommendations are given to pregnant women in the intervention arm of the Norwegian Fit for Delivery (FFD) study. This paper presents the rationale and test-retest reliability of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a dietary score measuring adherence to the recommendations. The study is part of the ongoing FFD study, a randomised, controlled, intervention study in nulliparous pregnant women. A 43-item FFQ was developed for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A test-retest reliability study was performed in a sample of 105 pregnant women who completed the presented questionnaire 2 weeks apart [28]. The six included items in this paper (both before and in pregnancy yielding 12 correlations) were found to have acceptable test-retest correlations (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) ranging from r = 0.525 ( p  = <0.01) for the variable “other fruits before pregnancy” to r = 0.800 ( p  = <0.01) for “fruits before pregnancy”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A test-retest reliability study was performed in a sample of 105 pregnant women who completed the presented questionnaire 2 weeks apart [28]. The six included items in this paper (both before and in pregnancy yielding 12 correlations) were found to have acceptable test-retest correlations (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) ranging from r = 0.525 ( p  = <0.01) for the variable “other fruits before pregnancy” to r = 0.800 ( p  = <0.01) for “fruits before pregnancy”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other obvious limitations were the cross-sectional design, the reliance on self-reported data and that the study did not investigate the full range of caffeinated beverages including tea, cola, energy drinks and cocoa. The FFQ used in the present study has shown acceptable test-retest reliability among pregnant women (68) . The FFQ challenges the respondents with complex tasks and in all dietary assessment methods misreporting is a serious problem (69) .…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fit for Delivery nutritional advice is based on recommendations from the Norwegian Directorate for Health [40], but is more specific and action-oriented. A complete discussion of the advice and its background is published elsewhere [41]. A follow-up consultation will take place 4–6 weeks after the first consultation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women will be encouraged to answer the questionnaire electronically, with access from the Fit for Delivery web site, but a written version will also be available in both Norwegian and English. The questionnaires will include demographic variables, the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [43] and a questionnaire specially designed to assess the key nutritional behaviors which are highlighted in Fit for Delivery [41]. At the time of inclusion, women will be asked to report on both current status and status before pregnancy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation