The <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic and its impact on esthetic dermatology

Aryanian, Zeinab; Ehsani, Amirhooshang; Razavi, Zahra; Hamzelou, Shahin; Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni; Hatami, Parvaneh

doi:10.1111/jocd.15386

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…22 Nevertheless, facial filler reactions are being increasingly reported in this setting. [23][24][25] Previously, dermal filler reactions had been reported after influenza and zoster vaccines. 26,27 As has previously been mentioned, vaccines can precipitate tardive adverse events in the filler injected tissues due to their immunostimulant effects.…”

Section: Vaccine-induced Filler Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…COVID‐19 vaccines have been associated with a wide range of allergic and anaphylactic reactions, some of which are serious and of medical significance 22 . Nevertheless, facial filler reactions are being increasingly reported in this setting 23–25 . Previously, dermal filler reactions had been reported after influenza and zoster vaccines 26,27 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

COVID‐19 vaccines and filler reactions: Should it be considered as a concern?

Aryanian

Balighi

Emadi

et al. 2022

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Any implant or external material used in the body tissues can potentially be followed by autoimmune or inflammatory reactions. With the global vaccination program against COVID‐19, reports of tissue filler reactions would be increasingly demonstrated. Although the end of pandemic was announced, the necessity of continuing COVID vaccination in future mandates gathering data regarding safety of vaccines. Here in, we summarized the data regarding COVID vaccination and filler reactions and discussed its etiopathogenesis, management and importance.

show abstract

Section: Vaccine-induced Filler Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID‐19 vaccines and filler reactions: Should it be considered as a concern?

Aryanian

Balighi

Emadi

et al. 2022

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rapidly evolving public health strategies attempted to control the spread of the disease but were insufficient to slow down the spread of the disease. All industries were hit by the epidemic, and plastic surgery was no exception 1–3 4 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adverse reactions to cosmetic implants after COVID‐19 vaccination: A literature review

Cheng,

Cai,

Tang

2023

J of Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAs the world's population of people vaccinated with the COVID‐19 vaccine increases, adverse reactions are increasingly being reported. There have been progressive reports of the effects of COVID‐19 vaccination on cosmetic fillers or prostheses, but they have not been reviewed based on their clinical morphologic patterns. This article reviewed the progress of research on adverse reactions to cosmetic implants after COVID‐19 vaccination.MethodsWe researched the English‐language literature up to October 15, 2022, using predefined keywords to identify relevant studies about adverse reactions to cosmetic implants after the COVID‐19 vaccination, collecting patient characteristics, implant type, the time interval between vaccination and implantation or injection, time of onset, symptoms, treatments, and outcomes.ResultsAmong the adverse reactions to implants associated with COVID‐19 vaccination, we distinguished between (1) injectable fillers and (2) surgical prosthetic implants. The most common adverse reactions were at the site of hyaluronic acid injection and breast prosthesis after Pfizer vaccination, mainly DIRs, and mainly manifested as edema, rash, fever, and capsular contracture. This paper also reported the possible causes, treatments of DIRs, and limitations of current studies.ConclusionsIn this article, we attempted to investigate and discuss all the adverse reactions of cosmetic implants related to COVID‐19 vaccination in the current literature, to unmask these reactions and make a more accurate assessment of vaccine safety.

show abstract

“…Due to the closure of many cosmetic/beauty services and limited accessibility to aesthetic procedures during the lockdown, people with high dysmorphic concerns were reported to have worsened appearance dissatisfaction [ 13 , 14 ]. Consequently, video conferencing may also have led to the developing of dysmorphic ideas and increased demand for aesthetic and cosmetic procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Aesthetic Concerns Identified by Video Conferencing

Almutairi¹,

Alhassan²,

AbdElneam³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDuring and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a significant increase in the demand for aesthetic procedures nationwide. We believe that one of the factors contributing to this increase was the use of video conferencing apps. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the aesthetic concerns that were identified by video conferencing. MethodologyIn Saudi Arabia, an observational, cross-sectional study was conducted from February to April, 2022. An online survey was used to assess the aesthetic concerns raised by video conferencing. The survey addressed multiple aspects, including demographic data, information on video call utilization, the attentional focus of the participants during video calls, and new appearance concerns identified on video calls. ResultsThe survey successfully captured 432 adult participants. More than 85% of participants disliked at least one character of their appearance during video conferencing. The skin color type (based on the Fitzpatrick scale), time spent on video calls, and visual focus during the virtual meeting were significantly correlated with selfperception of new disliked features. ConclusionVideo conferencing showed a significant statistical correlation with identified disliked facial/body features in both genders. People with skin color type III were less likely to perceive a disliked feature through video conferencing applications. The likelihood of having a disliked feature was significantly higher among individuals who spent up to one hour per day using video calls. Additionally, those who mainly paid attention to their face or body during virtual meetings were more likely to have disliked features.

show abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic and its impact on esthetic dermatology

Cited by 5 publications

References 48 publications

COVID‐19 vaccines and filler reactions: Should it be considered as a concern?

COVID‐19 vaccines and filler reactions: Should it be considered as a concern?

Adverse reactions to cosmetic implants after COVID‐19 vaccination: A literature review

An Analysis of Aesthetic Concerns Identified by Video Conferencing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About