1995
DOI: 10.1080/00139157.1995.9929210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Science of Policymaking: Responding to ENSO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second dimension refers to the actors, and therefore to the question of who adapts. A great number of researchers have conducted their research within the laboratory of extreme events and climate variability, suggesting that the factors that determine the responses to such events are often the same that influence the capacity to adapt to longer-term climate change (Golnaraghi and Kaul, 1995;Podesta´et al, 2002;Ziervogel and Downing, 2004), especially since adaptation to climate change may involve primarily a response to a greater threat of the extreme (McBean, 2004). Later in this paper we draw from two case studies that are examples of responses to the risks of climate change related extreme events (flood and drought), and we suggest that they do shed important light on longerterm adaptation, since adaptation to climate change by private actors (like homeowners or farmers) does not qualify as adaptation to climate change as such (i.e., a global, long-term phenomenon) but as adaptation to climate change related regional and short-term impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dimension refers to the actors, and therefore to the question of who adapts. A great number of researchers have conducted their research within the laboratory of extreme events and climate variability, suggesting that the factors that determine the responses to such events are often the same that influence the capacity to adapt to longer-term climate change (Golnaraghi and Kaul, 1995;Podesta´et al, 2002;Ziervogel and Downing, 2004), especially since adaptation to climate change may involve primarily a response to a greater threat of the extreme (McBean, 2004). Later in this paper we draw from two case studies that are examples of responses to the risks of climate change related extreme events (flood and drought), and we suggest that they do shed important light on longerterm adaptation, since adaptation to climate change by private actors (like homeowners or farmers) does not qualify as adaptation to climate change as such (i.e., a global, long-term phenomenon) but as adaptation to climate change related regional and short-term impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watts 1983, Downing 1991, Corbett 1988, Golnaraghi & Kaul 1995 vividly demon-strates that vulnerability is as much about households and society as about climate variability. Whereas climatic events provide the context for understanding vulnerability, the concept itself is essentially a socioeconomic or ecological one.…”
Section: Introduction: Vulnerability and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first major success in climate forecast application occurred in 1992, when the Brazilian state of Ceará warned farmers of an impending El Niño and supplied them with free droughttolerant seeds, resulting in a dramatic increase in their yields over what they would have otherwise received (8). Several national and international meteorological organizations have since developed processes for ensuring that seasonal climate forecasts would be communicated to national-level decision makers (9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%