2007
DOI: 10.1080/15358590701211142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Science of Orality: Implications for Rhetorical Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, if we were only to map the human brain, we are missing the rest of the body's role in cognition; thinking-and certainly emotion-is not something that takes place in the brain alone [1,45]. Indeed, even something as seemingly mundane as listening to someone talk is an incredibly complicated process [46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if we were only to map the human brain, we are missing the rest of the body's role in cognition; thinking-and certainly emotion-is not something that takes place in the brain alone [1,45]. Indeed, even something as seemingly mundane as listening to someone talk is an incredibly complicated process [46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekpe (1997, p. 4) submits that rhetoric is "a process, an art, a finished work, a complex of relationships which depends on a skilful use of language in its oral or written form, in private and in public situations, guided by high ethical standards for the purpose of influencing the behaviour of an audience or listeners or readers in observable, discernible and perceptible ways for their own good." Lunceford (2007) is of the view that rhetoric is based on a belief that language can alter our perceptions and in so doing persuades us to carry out certain actions. Also, Howard (2010) opines that rhetoric is "the art or study of writing or speaking effectively or persuasively."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condit, 1996;Gibbons, 2007;Graham, 2009;Johnson, 2008), but also as a conceptual resource (eg. Davis, 2008;Fahnestock, 2005;Lunceford, 2007;Pruchnic, 2008). Even in 1990, it was already possible for Jeffrey Walker to observe that, "Periodically in recent years, neurological research has been invoked as an emerging and important source of knowledge for the rhetorician" (Walker, 1990, 301; for example, see Gregg, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%