2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-002-0528-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Schur Algorithm for Generalized Schur Functions II: Jordan Chains and Transformations of Characteristic Functions

Abstract: Abstract. In the first paper of this series (Daniel Alpay, Tomas Azizov, Aad Dijksma, and Heinz Langer: The Schur algorithm for generalized Schur functions I: coisometric realizations, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 129 (2001), pp. 1-36) it was shown that for a generalized Schur function sðzÞ, which is the characteristic function of a coisometric colligation V with state space being a Pontryagin space, the Schur transformation corresponds to a finite-dimensional reduction of the state space, and a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calculations imply (3) and show that g j (z, iy) → −f j (z) in L(N) as y ↑ ∞. Moreover, they imply…”
Section: Lemma 52 Assumementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These calculations imply (3) and show that g j (z, iy) → −f j (z) in L(N) as y ↑ ∞. Moreover, they imply…”
Section: Lemma 52 Assumementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The essential tool was the theory of reproducing kernel Pontryagin spaces and the Schur algorithm for generalized Schur functions as developed in [2][3][4][5][6][7]12,14,17,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we define the generalized Schur transformation for functions of the class S which are not constants of modulus one. The difference with the corresponding definitions in the papers [2,3] (taken from [11]) lies in the fact that here we define the transformation for all functions of S, and it becomes a little simpler since poles at zero are allowed. In Section 3 we recall the definition of reproducing kernel Pontryagin spaces and some related facts needed in the sequel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azizov, A. Dijksma, H. Langer and G. Wanjala (see [30][31][32][33][34]). Now we will sketch some recent developments on multivariable analogues of the Schur class in the unit disk.…”
Section: On Some Generalizations Of Schur Functions and The Classicalmentioning
confidence: 97%