Abstract:Compared 20 Ss within the schizophrenia spectrum and 20 nonschizophrenia spectrum controls in terms of their MMPI and Rorschach performance. Ss also were studied in terms of their ability to identify a briefly exposed visual stimulus when it was followed by a noninformational mask stimulus and when it was not. Ss did not differ on the MMPI or on their ability to identify an unmasked target stimulus. They differed significantly in the number of deviant verbalizations, a special scoring category of the Rorschach… Show more
“…among the normal, manic, and depressed control groups; however, the good and poor prognosis schizophrenic subjects had significantly longer critical ISIs than controls. In another study, Saccuzzo and Miller (1977) reported significantly longer critical ISIs in delusional schizophrenic patients than in a normal control group. Both of these studies were interpreted as supporting the notion that backward-masking performance is a direct reflection of information-processing speed.…”
Many researchers have used backward masking to examine information-processing speed in schizophrenic subjects. The validity of this approach rests upon two main assumptions. One is that the mask effectively limits the time a previously presented stimulus is available for processing. The other is that the components of the masking mechanism in schizophrenic subjects are comparable to those in control groups. It is argued that the masking procedures used in these studies fail to meet either assumption. Alternative interpretations of these investigations, however, suggest important hypotheses for further research in our quest to understand information-processing deficits associated with schizophrenia.
“…among the normal, manic, and depressed control groups; however, the good and poor prognosis schizophrenic subjects had significantly longer critical ISIs than controls. In another study, Saccuzzo and Miller (1977) reported significantly longer critical ISIs in delusional schizophrenic patients than in a normal control group. Both of these studies were interpreted as supporting the notion that backward-masking performance is a direct reflection of information-processing speed.…”
Many researchers have used backward masking to examine information-processing speed in schizophrenic subjects. The validity of this approach rests upon two main assumptions. One is that the mask effectively limits the time a previously presented stimulus is available for processing. The other is that the components of the masking mechanism in schizophrenic subjects are comparable to those in control groups. It is argued that the masking procedures used in these studies fail to meet either assumption. Alternative interpretations of these investigations, however, suggest important hypotheses for further research in our quest to understand information-processing deficits associated with schizophrenia.
“…Items are not erased when they are read out by attention into a more stable memory before the “mask arrives”. In schizophrenia patients, this read out process is slower (or otherwise disturbed) and, hence, performance is more strongly deteriorated in visual masking ( Braff, 1981 , Braff and Saccuzzo, 1981 , Braff and Saccuzzo, 1985 , Merritt and Balogh, 1984 , Patterson et al, 1986 , Saccuzzo and Miller, 1977 , Saccuzzo and Braff, 1981 , Saccuzzo and Braff, 1986 , Saccuzzo and Schubert, 1981 , Saccuzzo et al, 1974 , Saccuzzo et al, 1984 , Schwartz et al, 1983 ; for a review and criticism: Schuck and Lee, 1989 ; see also McClure, 2001 ). Research was concerned for about a decade with this hypothesis until the dual channel approach became the predominant view and research changed gears.…”
Visual masking is a frequently used tool in schizophrenia research. Visual masking has a very high sensitivity and specificity and masking paradigms have been proven to be endophenotypes. Whereas masking is a powerful technique to study schizophrenia, the underlying mechanisms are discussed controversially. For example, for more than 25 years, masking deficits of schizophrenia patients were mainly attributed to a deficient magno-cellular system (M-system). Here, we show that there is very little evidence that masking deficits are magno-cellular deficits. We will discuss the magno-cellular and other approaches in detail and highlight their pros and cons.
“…Even the test's critics agree that some Rorschach scores are related to schizophrenia (Dawes, 1994;Wood, et al, 1996aWood, et al, , 1996b; but see Frank, 1990). As numerous studies have shown (e.g., Archer & Gordon, 1988;Hilsenroth, Fowler, & Padawer, 1998;Johnston & Holzman, 1979;Saccuzzo, Braff, Sprock, & Sudik, 1984;Wagner, 1998), psychotic patients who take the Rorschach often show slippage in the use of language ("deviant verbalizations") or report seeing things in the blots that other people cannot ("bad form"). Some Rorschach scores that are related to schizophrenia also appear to be related to bipolar disorder (Frank, 1990;Khadavi, Wetzler, & Wilson, 1997) and perhaps to schizotypal personality disorder as well (Hilsenroth et al, 1998).…”
Section: Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the symptoms of schizophrenia tend to be striking and serious, there is usually little point in administering the Rorschach to confirm a diagnosis established by clinical interview or collateral information. Furthermore, if testing is deemed necessary, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is considerably less expensive and seems to be equally or more valid for the purpose than the Rorschach (Archer & Gordon, 1988; but see Saccuzzo et al, 1984). For example, although the CS Schizophrenia Index (SCZI ) (Exner, 1986a; is related to schizophrenia, no published studies have shown that it can add significant incremental validity for diagnoses of the disorder, beyond what can be obtained from an interview and MMPI scores.…”
Section: Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
The present article comments on a classic study by Garfield (1947) then reviews research on the Rorschach and psychiatric diagnoses. Despite a few positive findings, the Rorschach has demonstrated little validity as a diagnostic tool. Deviant verbalizations and bad form on the Rorschach, and indices based on these variables, are related to Schizophrenia and perhaps to Bipolar Disorder and Schizotypal Personality Disorder. Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder also seem to give an above-average number of deviant verbalizations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.