2021
DOI: 10.15823/p.2021.141.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scale of Evaluating Instruction in Pandemic Process: Development, Validation, and Reliability

Abstract: The study aims to develop a scale for determining student views on distance instruction, hybrid instruction, and back-to-school process after the pandemic. The study data were obtained from 442 students. EFA and CFA were performed to determine the scale‘s construct validity. Moreover, to decide the data collection tool‘s reliability, item analysis was conducted and internal consistency coefficients were estimated. Based on the results obtained from the validity and reliability analysis of the scale, it can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected using the "Scale of Evaluating Instruction in Pandemic Process" developed by Tutal et al (2021). The scale consisted of three parts: the first part probed participants' demographic characteristics, the second part consisted of five-point Likerttype items ("Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Undecided, Agree, Strongly Agree"), and the third part involved four-point Likert-type items "Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Often, Always".…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected using the "Scale of Evaluating Instruction in Pandemic Process" developed by Tutal et al (2021). The scale consisted of three parts: the first part probed participants' demographic characteristics, the second part consisted of five-point Likerttype items ("Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Undecided, Agree, Strongly Agree"), and the third part involved four-point Likert-type items "Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Often, Always".…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%