2002
DOI: 10.2307/3100083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scale of Community Structure: Habitat Variation and Avian Guilds in Tropical Forest Understory

Abstract: The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understory The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understory AbstractBoth local and regional habitat characteristics influence species richness and community structure. The scale at which communities are studied, however, affects the detection of relationships between habitat characteristics and patterns of habitat selection, species diversity, and species composition, and ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(114 reference statements)
5
77
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial scale dependence of species richness or abundance can be analysed using a multiple scale approach (Pearman, 2002). In arthropods (see Chust et al, 2004;Holland et al, 2004;Clough et al, 2005;Gaucherel et al, 2007;Gonzá lez-Mejias et al, 2007;Hendrickx et al, 2007;Driscoll, 2008), such analysis can help to identify the spatial scales at which a predictor variable influences species richness and abundance of local communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial scale dependence of species richness or abundance can be analysed using a multiple scale approach (Pearman, 2002). In arthropods (see Chust et al, 2004;Holland et al, 2004;Clough et al, 2005;Gaucherel et al, 2007;Gonzá lez-Mejias et al, 2007;Hendrickx et al, 2007;Driscoll, 2008), such analysis can help to identify the spatial scales at which a predictor variable influences species richness and abundance of local communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results may be explained by the fact that most of the pollinator visits were by hummingbirds which often travel widely in search of food. Previous work indicates that hummingbirds as a group show few abundance or species richness effects to landscape characteristics [23][24][25] although individual species may vary in their responses to land cover patterns [26]. Neotropical migratory birds also follow food supplies in some cases [34,35] and the migrants who visited I. edulis are found in a variety of land cover types in Costa Rica [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that tropical hummingbirds (who we assumed would be the most common pollinators) are less affected by landscape characteristics than other groups such as understory insectivores [23][24][25]. Amazonian forest hummingbird abundance did not change after forest fragmentation [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…While more than half of the studies were based on Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images, Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) scenes were used in 11 studies, sometimes along with Landsat TM scenes. Analyses of the higher spatial resolution French SPOT satellite were performed nine times (Miller and Conroy 1990, Andries et al 1994, Green and Griffiths 1994, Guinet et al 1995, Thibault et al 1998, Debinski et al 2000, 2002, Klaus et al 2001, Saveraid et al 2001) and the newer Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) two times (Debinski et al 2002, Kastdalen et al 2003. The Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was applied in 22 studies; six times it was used together with other satellite sensors.…”
Section: Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%