2005
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m412588200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Salmonella Effector Protein SopB Protects Epithelial Cells from Apoptosis by Sustained Activation of Akt

Abstract: Invasion of epithelial cells by Salmonella enterica is mediated by bacterial "effector" proteins that are delivered into the host cell by a type III secretion system. Although primarily known for their roles in actin rearrangements and membrane ruffling, translocated effectors also affect host cell processes that are not directly associated with invasion. Here, we show that SopB/SigD, an effector with phosphoinositide phosphatase activity, has anti-apoptotic activity in Salmonellainfected epithelial cells. Sal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
218
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
218
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some macrophages may provide a replicative niche for Salmonella, whereas others do not. One well-documented difference between macrophages and epithelial cells is that Salmonella can induce rapid cell death in macrophages, via caspase 1, whereas in epithelial cells a prosurvival pathway is activated [34]. In addition to macrophages, Salmonella interact with a variety of highly differentiated cell types in vivo each of which may require specific adaptions by the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some macrophages may provide a replicative niche for Salmonella, whereas others do not. One well-documented difference between macrophages and epithelial cells is that Salmonella can induce rapid cell death in macrophages, via caspase 1, whereas in epithelial cells a prosurvival pathway is activated [34]. In addition to macrophages, Salmonella interact with a variety of highly differentiated cell types in vivo each of which may require specific adaptions by the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may well be critical for SCV biogenesis but this has not been conclusively demonstrated and furthermore the in vivo substrate, or substrates, of SopB phosphatase activity remain undefined. Nonetheless, since PIs are involved either directly or indirectly in all eukaryotic cell processes, it is likely that SopB activity in the SCV membrane has additional pleiotropic effects [34]. Another T3SS1 effector that is expressed following invasion is SopD [35], a protein that may act cooperatively with SopB at least during initial formation of the phagosome [36].…”
Section: T3ss1 Effectors Mediate Early Scv Biogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SopE/SopE2 and the inositide phosphate phosphatase SopB are some of the effector proteins responsible for the induction of macropinocytosis. SopB is also involved in host cell survival through activation of the Akt signaling pathway [16,18,19]. Additional functions have recently been described for SPI-1, including activation of the host innate immune system and induction of cell death [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of bacterial pathogens are able to modulate host cell survival via effects on Akt. Among these are Salmonella enterica, Shigella flexneri, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, which inject into their host cells effector molecules that can activate Akt and thereby inhibit apoptosis during infection (Knodler et al, 2005;Edwards and Apicella, 2006;Pendaries et al, 2006). Similarly, cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1), a secreted toxin encoded by a number of E. coli pathogens, including some UPEC isolates, can prevent host cell apoptosis by the stimulation of Akt and subsequent NF B activation (Miraglia et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UTI89 caused a marked decline in S473 phosphorylation by 90 min after infection, whereas infection with AAEC185/pSH2 did not ( Figure 1A). These results were quantified and normalized by dividing pAkt S473 levels by total Akt1 levels, as shown in the graph in Figure 1A.Some bacterial pathogens are known to actively modulate Akt signaling by secreting effector proteins into target host cells (Edwards and Apicella, 2006;Knodler et al, 2005;Pendaries et al, 2006;Ashare et al, 2007). To address this possibility with UPEC, we infected 5637 bladder cells with either live or gentamicin-killed UTI89.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%