1948
DOI: 10.1177/00220345480270050701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Salivary Amylase Activity of Carious and Noncarious Individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the concentration of salivary amylase in the same individual, whilst on the same diet, did not vary significantly over a period of months, thus confirming the findings of Hess & Smith (1948). A typical example from each group is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It was found that the concentration of salivary amylase in the same individual, whilst on the same diet, did not vary significantly over a period of months, thus confirming the findings of Hess & Smith (1948). A typical example from each group is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Amylase levels and incidence of dental caries have been studied by several authors. Bergeim and Barnfield, 18 Hess and Smith, 19 Sullivan and Storvick 20 reported lack of correlation between dental caries and salivary amylase. They used techniques, such as starch hydrolysis in their experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Volker and Pinkerton (1947) found no essential difference in the quantities of acid formed in starch-saliva and in glucose-saliva mixtures when unstimulated saliva from caries-active patients was incubated with various carbohydrate solutions at 370 C. Stephan (1948) reported that the ability of selected oral acidogenic microorganisms to utilize soluble starch in a chemically defined artificial medium is dependent upon the type of carbohydrate and upon the presence of a salivary or bacterial amylase. Clinically, however, there does not appear to be any significant difference between the salivary amylase activity of "caries-active" and "caries-immune " persons (Hess and Smith, 1948).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%