The safety barometer

Knegtering, B.; Pasman, Hans J.

doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.02.012

Cited by 32 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Past accidents show that occupational safety indicators only cannot be used to monitor changes in process risk [15,19,27,65], such as the Macondo Blowout in 2010 [10]. In this article, occupational safety indicators are excluded from further consideration, since few or no personnel will be on board the AMS during operation in the future.…”

Section: Safety Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different safety indicators consider different periods of change, since some changes occur slower than others [27]. Hence, efforts are made to capture fast changing safety factors, to include them in real-time safety monitoring, e.g., by Knegtering and Pasman [27], or Vinnem et al [57].…”

Section: Safety Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One important aspect of using safety indicators is the sampling interval [27]. Three sampling categories should be considered: short-term, mid-term and long term.…”

Section: Identify Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Currently, review and subsequent updating, however, may be carried out after several years in operation. Changes in environmental, technical and organizational conditions may occur in shorter intervals than the reviews [27]. Hence, there is a need for indicators to measure safety performance and methods for analysis and monitoring of risk and safety during operation of AMS.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems

Thieme

Utne

2017

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The marine environment is vast, harsh, and challenging. Unanticipated faults and events might lead to loss of vessels, transported goods, collected scientific data, and business reputation. Hence, systems have to be in place that monitor the safety performance of operation and indicate if it drifts into an intolerable safety level. This article proposes a process for developing safety indicators for the operation of autonomous marine systems (AMS). The condition of safety barriers and resilience engineering form the basis for the development of safety indicators, synthesizing and further adjusting the dual assurance and the resilience based early warning indicator (REWI) approaches. The article locates the process for developing safety indicators in the system life cycle emphasizing a timely implementation of the safety indicators. The resulting safety indicators reflect safety in AMS operation and can assist in planning of operations, in daily operational decision-making, and identification of improvements. Operation of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) exemplifies the process for developing safety indicators and their implementation. The case study shows that the proposed process leads to a comprehensive set of safety indicators. It is expected that application of the resulting safety indicators consequently will contribute to safer operation of current and future AMS.

show abstract

Section: Safety Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Safety Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One important aspect of using safety indicators is the sampling interval [27]. Three sampling categories should be considered: short-term, mid-term and long term.…”

Section: Identify Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems

Thieme

Utne

2017

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…et al [41], Tixier et al [42]) in laboratory experiments (Dempsey et al [43]) or using digital human modeling (Illmann et al [44], Demirel and Duffy [3], Fritzsche et al [45], Neumann and Medbo [46], Cimino et al [47]) have been used to complete the comprehension, formalizing and modeling of the decisional subsystem of the system under study. Quantitative or qualitative characterization of such a model can be achieved using Bayesian methods (Knegtering and Pasman [48], Hu et al [49]) or multi-criteria methods such as AHP (analytical hierarchy process) (Saaty, [98]) or ELECTRE, when specific events can be associated with risks and probabilities of their occurrence can be estimated.…”

Section: Integrated Risk Management a Promising Avenuementioning

confidence: 99%

De-Icing of aircraft: Incorporating business risks and occupational health and safety

Nadeau¹,

Morency²

2017

Int. J. SAFE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Airliner maintenance is a high-risk sector from an occupational health and safety perspective. In the current context of increasing air traffic worldwide and in view of the economic and safety issues associated with aircraft maintenance, it is imperative that companies providing this service receive support in their quest to reconcile operational performance with OHS. A survey of interdisciplinary research published from 2004 to 2014 allowed analysis of current thought in industrial engineering, human factors engineering and aeronautical de-icing, thus revealing a need for the design of aircraft de-icing activities that are sustainable, holistic and integrated. In response to market evolution, aeronautics will have to offer aircrafts that are greener, meaning safe for all users (including maintenance workers) and the environment throughout the product lifecycle.

show abstract