2016
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety band of Antarctic ice shelves

Abstract: International audienceThe floating ice shelves along the seaboard of the Antarctic ice sheet restrain the outflow of upstream grounded ice. Removal of these ice shelves, as shown by past ice-shelf recession and break-up, accelerates the outflow, which adds to sea-level rise. A key question in predicting future outflow is to quantify the extent of calving that might precondition other dynamic consequences and lead to loss of ice-shelf restraint. Here we delineate frontal areas that we label as ‘passive shelf ic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
453
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
24
453
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these trajectories, the HC is expected to continue along its current west-east trajectory towards the StancombWills Glacier Tongue, cutting across a region with uniform tensile stresses that are aligned north-south perpendicular to the grounding line and second principal stresses that are compressive throughout. The estimated trajectory therefore cuts deep into an area of buttressed ice, which could have important implications for the structural integrity of the ice shelf (Doake et al, 1997;Fürst et al, 2016). Note that the estimated trajectory was ended after 50 km because of possible interactions with the active Brunt-Stancomb-Wills Chasm (see Fig.…”
Section: Future Fracture Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these trajectories, the HC is expected to continue along its current west-east trajectory towards the StancombWills Glacier Tongue, cutting across a region with uniform tensile stresses that are aligned north-south perpendicular to the grounding line and second principal stresses that are compressive throughout. The estimated trajectory therefore cuts deep into an area of buttressed ice, which could have important implications for the structural integrity of the ice shelf (Doake et al, 1997;Fürst et al, 2016). Note that the estimated trajectory was ended after 50 km because of possible interactions with the active Brunt-Stancomb-Wills Chasm (see Fig.…”
Section: Future Fracture Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not include glacial isostatic adjustment or gravitational feedbacks. Under our conservative forcing we have not included climatic variations, changes to the calving front [Fürst et al, 2016], changes to basal drag caused by altered subglacial hydrology, or hydrofracture and ice cliff failure [DeConto and Pollard, 2016]. These processes all merit further investigation.…”
Section: Figure 3 (Top Left) Shows Bayesian Probabilities P(s > Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cook and Vaughan, 2010 and references therein), the inland glaciers that feed the ice shelves accelerated (e.g. Fürst and others, 2016) and marine-and land-terminating glaciers experienced enhanced thinning and retreat (e.g. Davies and others, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%