2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02965-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rotten core of presentism

Abstract: Recently, some have attempted to reformulate debates in first-order metaphysics, particularly in the metaphysics of time and modality, for reasons due to Williamson (Modal logic as metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 2013). In this paper, we focus on the ways in which the likes of Cameron, Correia and Rosenkranz, Deasy, Ingram, Tallant, Viebahn, inter alia, have initiated and responded to attempts to capture the core of presentism using a formal, logical machinery. We argue that such attempts are doomed to f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to note that, as highlighted by Tallant and Ingram (Ref. [12]), a well-defined philosophical framework of Presentism is missing, as several (and sometimes contradicting) descriptions are proposed in the literature. Among them, we will consider in this contribution the definition stating that "Only the present time exists (No non-present time exists)".…”
Section: Identifying a Quantum Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note that, as highlighted by Tallant and Ingram (Ref. [12]), a well-defined philosophical framework of Presentism is missing, as several (and sometimes contradicting) descriptions are proposed in the literature. Among them, we will consider in this contribution the definition stating that "Only the present time exists (No non-present time exists)".…”
Section: Identifying a Quantum Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tallant and Ingram face the critics to a Presentism perspective in Ref. [6], and highlight that a well-defined philosophical framework of Presentism is missing, and that several descriptions are proposed in the literature. Following Ref.…”
Section: The Present Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Growing Block, for example, is committed to the existence of the past that grows as ever more present moments are added (Broad 1923; Tooley 1997; Correia and Rosenkranz 2003; Braddon‐Mitchell 2004; Forest 2004; Merricks 2006; Forbes 2015; Deng 2017; Correia and Rosenkranz 2018; Miller 2018; Perović 2019). Presentism, on the other hand, holds that only the present moment exists; the past is gone, and the future is not yet here; only and all existing things are present things (Bigelow 1996; Zimmerman 1998; Hinchliff 2000; Percival 2002; Crisp 2003; Zimmerman, 2004, part 1; Bourne 2006; Fine 2006; Zimmerman 2008; Tamm and Olivier 2019; Emery 2020; Tallant and Ingram 2020). Alternatively, the Moving Spotlight view accepts the existence of all moments in time, but contains the additional postulate that an objective present moment moves through these moments picking out metaphysically privileged nows like a spotlight moving across a field (Skow 2009, 2015; Cameron 2015).…”
Section: Arguments For a B‐theory Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%