2010
DOI: 10.1027/1192-5604/a000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rorschach and the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the vast availability of information related to the Rorschach inkblot test that can be accessed easily and effortlessly, including the inkblot cards on the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia (Nashat, 2010;Schultz & Loving, 2012), it has to be taken into consideration that web-based administration of the Rorschach inkblot test might increase the possibility of malingering and providing fake responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the vast availability of information related to the Rorschach inkblot test that can be accessed easily and effortlessly, including the inkblot cards on the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia (Nashat, 2010;Schultz & Loving, 2012), it has to be taken into consideration that web-based administration of the Rorschach inkblot test might increase the possibility of malingering and providing fake responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the vast availability of information related to the Rorschach inkblot test that can be accessed easily and effortlessly, including the inkblot cards on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia (Nashat, 2010;Schulz and Loving, 2012), it has to be taken into consideration that web-based administration of the Rorschach inkblot test might increase the possibility of malingering and providing fake responses. For example, a patient taking the Rorschach inkblot test at home on a personal computer could request the help of a friend or family member to provide responses, and there is also the risk of sourcing responses that are classified as "normal."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation